2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.03.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applicability of Hydrologic Response Units in low topographic relief catchments and evaluation using high resolution aerial photograph analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the susceptibility assessment of debris flow hazard was based on the drainage basin unit. In such a model, a hydrological response unit can fully represent the hillside hydrological process and will make the results more meaningful (Khan et al, 2013(Khan et al, , 2016Zou et al, 2019). First, drainage networks were extracted from the ASTER (Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer) digital elevation model (DEM) by using the ArcGIS ArcHydro Toolbox, and regions without obvious watershed characteristics were directly deleted.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the susceptibility assessment of debris flow hazard was based on the drainage basin unit. In such a model, a hydrological response unit can fully represent the hillside hydrological process and will make the results more meaningful (Khan et al, 2013(Khan et al, , 2016Zou et al, 2019). First, drainage networks were extracted from the ASTER (Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer) digital elevation model (DEM) by using the ArcGIS ArcHydro Toolbox, and regions without obvious watershed characteristics were directly deleted.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the susceptibility assessment of debris flow hazard was based on the drainage basins unit. In a debris flow susceptibility assessment model, hydro-logical response unit can fully represent the hydrological process of hillside and will make the results more meaningful (Khan et al 2013;Khan et al 2016;Zou et al 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the susceptibility assessment of debris flow hazard was based on the drainage basins unit. In a debris flow susceptibility assessment model, hydro-logical response unit can fully represent the hydrological process of hillside and will make the results more meaningful (Khan et al 2013;Khan et al 2016;Zou et al 2019). Throughout the modeling process, our primary assumption here are as follows: First, while local properties surely affect the timing, size, and behavior of a mass movement, the dominant control on where they occur is the local surface topography, as it in turn defines local slope and shallow subsurface flow convergence; Second, all the evaluated basins have the possibility of debris flow; Thirdly, each evaluation factors should be available for all basins, otherwise, it should be excluded; Finally, the model should also need to integrate the system characteristics of debris flow disaster, the future development trend of climate change, and the social demand under the theoretical background of the new era to carry out reasonable modeling.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%