2013
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2478.12019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applicability of 1D and 2.5D marine controlled source electromagnetic modelling

Abstract: We present two‐and‐a‐half dimensional (2.5D) and three‐dimensional (3D) integral equation modelling of the marine controlled source electromagnetic method. We implement 2.5D modelling using a point source and a two‐dimensional reservoir and compare the results with point source responses from one‐dimensional and three‐dimensional reservoir models. These methods are based on an electric field domain integral equation formulation. We show how the 2.5D method performs in terms of both accuracy and computing speed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the context of offshore hydrocarbon exploration, inline CSEM responses from thin, deeply buried 2-D reservoirs can often closely match those from 3-D reservoirs whereas the corresponding 1-D model responses are usually significantly different (e.g. Tehrani & Slob 2013). Furthermore, 1-D models cannot reproduce the effects of seafloor topography that are possible with 2-D modeling (Li & Constable 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of offshore hydrocarbon exploration, inline CSEM responses from thin, deeply buried 2-D reservoirs can often closely match those from 3-D reservoirs whereas the corresponding 1-D model responses are usually significantly different (e.g. Tehrani & Slob 2013). Furthermore, 1-D models cannot reproduce the effects of seafloor topography that are possible with 2-D modeling (Li & Constable 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 4-layer offshore model with a 100-m thick hydrocarbon layer buried at a depth of 1 km in host sediments in 1 km water depth. 3D EM responses of disk-shaped hydrocarbon reservoir in marine sediment that 1D models are not appropriate when the shape of disk is not circular and its size is smaller in the cross-line direction than in the in-line direction (Tehrani and Slob, 2013).…”
Section: Disk Model Responsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the presence of a 3D point source, a 1D formation model allows to reduce the dimensionality of the problem from 3D to the so-called 1.5D via a Hankel transform (or two Fourier transforms) (see, e.g., [12][13][14]). This 1.5D approximation can also be used to obtain an initial subsurface resistivity distribution from marine CSEM measurements [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%