2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applicability and accuracy of Demirjian and Willems methods in a population of Eastern Chinese subadults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
26
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Chinese population 3335 was evaluated in three studies showing contrasting results. In Wang et al, 33 based on eastern Chinese subadult, and in Yue Zhai et al., 34 based on the northern Chinese population, Demirjian’s method was more reliable and accurate than Willems’. On the other hand, according to Yue et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Chinese population 3335 was evaluated in three studies showing contrasting results. In Wang et al, 33 based on eastern Chinese subadult, and in Yue Zhai et al., 34 based on the northern Chinese population, Demirjian’s method was more reliable and accurate than Willems’. On the other hand, according to Yue et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the development of different scales and methods, the Demirjian's scale is still considered to be one of most reliable bases for estimating DA in Caucasian children [16]. However, it has been found that in some populations, the scale tends to overestimate DA in relation to the chronological maturity of the child [17,18]. In addition, differences in DA have been found in various populations and these have been attributed to differences in the timing of their overall maturation; for example, a study population of Hong Kong residents were found to be more advanced overall in dental development compared with a British Caucasian population, by an average of 5 months [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ye et al [28] selected 941 orthopantomograms of 7-14-year-old children from Eastern China and found that the Willems's method was more accurate in estimating the dental age than the Demirjian's method [28]. For the 11-18-year-olds from Eastern China, the Demirjian's method was more reliable compared to the Willems's method according to Wang et al [26]. They conclude that the Demirjian's method was unsatisfactory for 11-18-year-olds from Eastern China [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%