2020
DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(20)31005-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Apple Watch Series 4 vs. 12-Lead Ecg: A Comparison of Manual Electrocardiographic Waveform Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent validation study performed in 129 healthy volunteers showed a reasonable concordance between QTc intervals measured from the Apple Watch and a 12-lead ECG (mean difference: −11.67 ± 8.32 ms; r = 0.57). 7 In addition, a prior study demonstrated the ability to use a smartphone-based heart monitor to accurately detect QTc prolongation in a patient receiving QT-prolonging medications, the results of which revealed a difference of 4 ms with standard deviation of 11 ms as compared with the 12-lead ECG. 8 Elsewhere, another study found that QTc measurement using a single-lead handheld mobile device is feasible, but the QTc measurement was underestimated (23 ms; 95% confidence interval: 13–34 ms) when only a lead I rhythm strip was obtained; when a vector analogous to lead II could be recorded, QTc measurements had a very close correlation with the maximum QTc interval determined by 12-lead ECG.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A recent validation study performed in 129 healthy volunteers showed a reasonable concordance between QTc intervals measured from the Apple Watch and a 12-lead ECG (mean difference: −11.67 ± 8.32 ms; r = 0.57). 7 In addition, a prior study demonstrated the ability to use a smartphone-based heart monitor to accurately detect QTc prolongation in a patient receiving QT-prolonging medications, the results of which revealed a difference of 4 ms with standard deviation of 11 ms as compared with the 12-lead ECG. 8 Elsewhere, another study found that QTc measurement using a single-lead handheld mobile device is feasible, but the QTc measurement was underestimated (23 ms; 95% confidence interval: 13–34 ms) when only a lead I rhythm strip was obtained; when a vector analogous to lead II could be recorded, QTc measurements had a very close correlation with the maximum QTc interval determined by 12-lead ECG.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While these devices have been validated for their ability to monitor heart rates and differentiate sinus rhythm from atrial fibrillation, 6 their accuracy for other ECG-interpretation purposes has not been well studied to date. However, the waveforms produced have been shown to correlate reasonably well with standard ECG intervals including the corrected QT (QTc) interval 7 and have previously been used to detect drug-induced QT interval prolongation. 8 As patients with COVID-19 infection continue to overwhelm our global health care system and resources, the ability to remotely monitor patients for cardiac complications of COVID-19 infection and ensure their safety during pharmacologic treatment has become increasingly important.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The study also found moderate to strong agreement in manual measurement of heart rate and basic intervals between devices represented by Bland-Altman plots, including QTc interval. 21 Based on this finding, it is likely that the Apple Watch may have a role in the diagnosis of other heart rhythm disturbance, however, the access to its ECG feature is currently restricted in Asia, including Indonesia . Another challenge in the utility of Apple Watch for routine clinical practice is affordability, especially in developing countries.…”
Section: Wearable Technologies For Minimal or No Touch Ecg Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%