2023
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1280213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Apple Vision Pro: a new horizon in psychological research and therapy

Zhihui Zhang,
Lluis Giménez Giménez Mateu,
Josep M. Fort

Abstract: November CITATIONZhang Z, Giménez Mateu L and Fort JM ( ) Apple Vision Pro: a new horizon in psychological research and therapy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some more advanced systems combine eye tracking with the tracking of other facial features, introducing the recognition of emotional facial expressions and responses while performing different tasks, widening the use in psychological research. Announced in 2023, the Apple Vision Pro is a modern VR system equipped with 12 cameras and five sensors that offers high resolution tracking of gaze and emotional responses [ 74 ]. When considering the equipment used in the reviewed studies, there is a lot of variance in the brand of eye tracker, with more than 10 trackers mentioned throughout the reviewed studies and no consensus on a gold standard (see Table 2 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some more advanced systems combine eye tracking with the tracking of other facial features, introducing the recognition of emotional facial expressions and responses while performing different tasks, widening the use in psychological research. Announced in 2023, the Apple Vision Pro is a modern VR system equipped with 12 cameras and five sensors that offers high resolution tracking of gaze and emotional responses [ 74 ]. When considering the equipment used in the reviewed studies, there is a lot of variance in the brand of eye tracker, with more than 10 trackers mentioned throughout the reviewed studies and no consensus on a gold standard (see Table 2 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%