2012
DOI: 10.5861/ijrse.2012.v1i2.24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Apple and oranges: Comparison of Taiwan higher education institutions’ internationalization

Abstract: The internationalization of higher education has become more obvious during the last decade.With the world becoming more globalized, competitions among higher education institutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is quite useful since most websites are quite extensively maintained. However, as compared to previous studies with international students (non-Chinese speaking); results in previous studies show that the English websites of Taiwan universities needs to be updated and maintained [21]. This clearly indicates a difference that is of importance.…”
Section: B Comparative Differences From Studying In Taiwanmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…This is quite useful since most websites are quite extensively maintained. However, as compared to previous studies with international students (non-Chinese speaking); results in previous studies show that the English websites of Taiwan universities needs to be updated and maintained [21]. This clearly indicates a difference that is of importance.…”
Section: B Comparative Differences From Studying In Taiwanmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…These studies have mainly consisted of summaries of analysed policies. Few studies have focused on institutions and other stakeholders, most discussing the indicators of internationalization or quality assurance (Chin & Ching, 2009;Chin, Wu, & Ching, 2012).…”
Section: The Trend Of Higher Education Internationalization In Taiwanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While a plethora of definitions exist relating to the assessment and evaluation of institutional internationalization, a number of broad overlapping criteria can be gleaned and used as a conceptual framework. Chin, Wu, & Ching (2012) in their comparison of the degree of internationalization in the context of Taiwanese higher educational institutions use twelve indicators as measures: institutional commitments, strategic planning, funding, policy and guidelines, organizational infrastructure and resources, academic offerings and curriculum, internet presence, faculty and staff development, international students and scholars, study abroad, campus life, performance evaluation and accountability. Qiang (2003), in comparison, employs a paradigm of internationalization covering four approaches: activity (including curricula, study abroad, internationalizing faculty and recruitment of international students), competency (knowledge and skills), ethos (intercultural and international initiatives) and process (incorporating an international dimension into teaching, service and research).…”
Section: Research Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%