2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.05.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Appetitive traits and relationships with BMI in adults: Development of the Adult Eating Behaviour Questionnaire

Abstract: The Child Eating Behaviour Questionnaire (CEBQ) is a validated parent-report measure of appetitive traits associated with weight in childhood. There is currently no matched measure for use in adults. The aim of this study was to adapt the CEBQ into a self-report Adult Eating Behaviour Questionnaire (AEBQ) to explore whether the associations between appetitive traits and BMI observed in children are present in adults. Two adult samples were recruited one year apart from an online survey panel in 2013 (n = 708) … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

28
223
8
9

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 196 publications
(301 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
28
223
8
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The Adult Eating Behaviour Questionnaire (AEBQ) is an age‐upward extension of a widely used and well‐validated measure of individual differences in food approach (enjoyment of eating, eating in response to food cues in the environment, and eating in response to negative affect) and avoidance (responsiveness to satiety, slow pace of eating, undereating in response to negative affect, and picky/“fussy” eating) in children (Hunot et al, ; Wardle, Guthrie, Sanderson, & Rapoport, ). The Child Eating Behaviour Questionnaire (CEBQ) scales are concurrently and prospectively associated with adiposity in children (e.g., Antoniou et al, ; Boswell, Byrne, & Davies, ; Koch & Pollatos, ; Llewellyn & Fildes, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Adult Eating Behaviour Questionnaire (AEBQ) is an age‐upward extension of a widely used and well‐validated measure of individual differences in food approach (enjoyment of eating, eating in response to food cues in the environment, and eating in response to negative affect) and avoidance (responsiveness to satiety, slow pace of eating, undereating in response to negative affect, and picky/“fussy” eating) in children (Hunot et al, ; Wardle, Guthrie, Sanderson, & Rapoport, ). The Child Eating Behaviour Questionnaire (CEBQ) scales are concurrently and prospectively associated with adiposity in children (e.g., Antoniou et al, ; Boswell, Byrne, & Davies, ; Koch & Pollatos, ; Llewellyn & Fildes, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AEBQ shares seven of the original CEBQ scales (excluding a scale measuring desire to drink and including a newly added scale measuring subjective hunger). In two validation samples, the AEBQ scales (with the exception of scales measuring hunger and picky/fussy eating) were correlated with BMI in the expected directions (Hunot et al, 2016;Mallan et al, 2017). The psychometric properties of the AEBQ have yet to be studied in adults with severe obesity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian analitik observasional dengan desain cross-sectional. 28 Data asupan energi, karbohidrat, lemak, dan protein diukur melalui metode wawancara langsung menggunakan kuesioner FFQ semi kuantitatif. Hasil ukur dianalisis menggunakan software komputer Nutrisurvey.…”
Section: Metodeunclassified
“…Generally speaking, the shorter the duration of an experiment the more likely it is to be affected by a number of potential confounders including the psychometric eating traits of the subjects themselves. There are now a number of validated scales characterising appetite traits including (but not limited to) the Three Factor Eating Questionnaire (Stunkard & Messick, 1985), the Dutch Eating Behaviour Questionnaire (van Strein, Frijters, Bergers, & Defares, 1986), the Adult Eating Behaviour Questionnaire (Hunot, et al, 2016) and the Control of Eating Questionnaire (Dalton, Finlayson, Hill, & Blundell, 2015). It would be extremely valuable to agree a package of such questionnaires that are commonly used to profile the eating behaviour traits of study populations, and that can also be used to evaluate moderators of study outcomes.…”
Section: Controlling or Measuring Potential Contaminants And Confoundmentioning
confidence: 99%