2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-018-4890-z
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Appetitive startle modulation in the human laboratory predicts Cannabis craving in the natural environment

Abstract: Our findings support cue-modulated startle reactivity as an index of the phenotypic expression of cue-elicited cannabis craving.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gray et al (2018) examined predictors of treatment dropout including variables: baseline grams per use day and percent use days, medication side effects, and cannabis-related problems. Mereish et al (2018) focused on laboratory-measured startle response to predict real-world cue-elicited craving. Treloar Padovano and Miranda (2018a) used prerandomization data to examine daily associations between cannabis-use quantity, craving, and cannabis subjective responses of energized, excited, sedated, sluggish, and high.…”
Section: Appendix 1 Data Transparencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gray et al (2018) examined predictors of treatment dropout including variables: baseline grams per use day and percent use days, medication side effects, and cannabis-related problems. Mereish et al (2018) focused on laboratory-measured startle response to predict real-world cue-elicited craving. Treloar Padovano and Miranda (2018a) used prerandomization data to examine daily associations between cannabis-use quantity, craving, and cannabis subjective responses of energized, excited, sedated, sluggish, and high.…”
Section: Appendix 1 Data Transparencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Time was divided into four equal periods: 12 a.m. to 5:59 a.m., 6 a.m. to 11:59 a.m., 12 p.m. to 5:59 p.m., 6 p.m. to 11:59 p.m. In line with prior work (Mereish et al, 2018), time was coded such that 12 a.m. to 5:59 a.m. served as the reference group.…”
Section: Time Of Daymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We identified 8 studies (Table 1) that have used tasks in the laboratory and associated their readouts with self-reported EMA data on substance use collected in the field. For example, Mereish et al [21] measured appetitive startle responses to cannabis pictures in the laboratory using a startle response task. Next, participants reported cannabis cue exposure and craving, in the field.…”
Section: Mobile Data Collection Of Behavioral Tasks In Substance Use ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, participants reported cannabis cue exposure and craving, in the field. Using this method, Mereish et al [21] found that reduced appetitive startle responses were associated with a reduced influence of cue exposure on craving. In the same sample, Miranda et al [22] measured working memory (WM) in the laboratory and found that increased WM performance/capacity was associated with a reduced influence of stress on cannabis craving in the field.…”
Section: Mobile Data Collection Of Behavioral Tasks In Substance Use ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation