2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2004.09.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Appendicitis in childhood hematologic malignancies: analysis and comparison with typhilitis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
55
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(32 reference statements)
2
55
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Localized right lower quadrant abdominal tenderness was reported to occur in only 3 of 7 patients with appendicitis and hematologic malignancy, and 2 of the 7 patients did not have abdominal pain. 3 Our patient also did not complain of abdominal pain.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 48%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Localized right lower quadrant abdominal tenderness was reported to occur in only 3 of 7 patients with appendicitis and hematologic malignancy, and 2 of the 7 patients did not have abdominal pain. 3 Our patient also did not complain of abdominal pain.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 48%
“…[1][2][3][4] It was similar to the incidence of appendicitis in the general pediatric population. In children with leukemia, the abdominal tenderness and signs of peritoneal irritation (rebound tenderness, involuntary guarding, and abdominal wall rigidity), usually caused by appendicitis, are frequently blunted by the administration of chemotherapeutic agents including corticosteroids.…”
supporting
confidence: 52%
“…The difficulty in distinguishing appendicitis from nonsurgical abdominal pain in this complex population is becoming simplified with use of ultrasound and computed tomography (CT) [10]. In our series, all patients underwent an abdominal CT to confirm the diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The causes of abdominal pain were necrotizing enterocolitis (n = 17; 28%), small bowel obstruction (n = 7; 12%), diverticulitis (n = 3; 5%), appendicitis (n = 3; 5%), cholecystitis (n = 2; 3%), colonic pseudo-obstruction (n = 2; 3%), splenic rupture (n = 1; 2%), and no definite cause (n = 21; 35%). These diagnoses can be difficult to distinguish using imaging technology [6]. In our case, patients underwent abdominal CT to confirm the diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%