1989
DOI: 10.1159/000171893
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Appendicitis Can Be Treated Safely with a Negative Appendectomy Rate of 10%

Abstract: The surgical literature supports a negative laparotomy rate of 20% for patients who are explored for the diagnosis of appendicitis. It has been assumed that attempts at decreasing the negative laparotomy rate will increase the perforation rate to above 25%. We reviewed the experience at a community hospital with the treatment of appendicitis in 970 consecutive patients. Close inhospital observation was used to evaluate difficult cases. The negative laparotomy and perforation rates were 10 and 23%, respectively… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first case report (without using the term referring to Valentino) may have been Britt's description, in 1966, of a perforated duodenal ulcer that presented with a retrocecal abscess that was managed initially as a complication of ‘appendicitis’ 35 . Coincident acute appendicitis and perforated peptic ulceration were initially reported in 1930 and only a few cases have been discussed in the literature 36 . Based on a review of several large retrospective series of appendectomies, the incidence of finding a normal appendix and perforated peptic ulcer disease (Valentino's syndrome) is approximately 0.3% 38–41 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first case report (without using the term referring to Valentino) may have been Britt's description, in 1966, of a perforated duodenal ulcer that presented with a retrocecal abscess that was managed initially as a complication of ‘appendicitis’ 35 . Coincident acute appendicitis and perforated peptic ulceration were initially reported in 1930 and only a few cases have been discussed in the literature 36 . Based on a review of several large retrospective series of appendectomies, the incidence of finding a normal appendix and perforated peptic ulcer disease (Valentino's syndrome) is approximately 0.3% 38–41 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35 Coincident acute appendicitis and perforated peptic ulceration were initially reported in 1930 and only a few cases have been discussed in the literature. 36 Based on a review of several large retrospective series of appendectomies, the incidence of finding a normal appendix and perforated peptic ulcer disease (Valentino's syndrome) is approximately 0.3%. [38][39][40][41] The combined use of computed tomography scanning and diagnostic laparoscopy made Valentino's syndrome…”
Section: Aftermathmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 Because of the impressive increase in morbidity and mortality with perforation, a negative appendectomy rate of 10% 20% is still considered acceptable. 23 …”
Section: Adjunctive Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%