2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.06.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Appendiceal carcinoids in children—management and outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, reports of invasive disease either to the mesoappendix or with lymph node invasion (only six with lymph node invasion for all patients) were limited, suggesting that the rate of invasive disease is truly rare. Of note, only half of the studies discussed their center's approach to surveillance imaging, which ranged from imaging and laboratories for "high risk" patients to specific imaging and time duration (i.e., ultrasound every 3 mo for 1 y, then yearly for 5 y) [4,15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, reports of invasive disease either to the mesoappendix or with lymph node invasion (only six with lymph node invasion for all patients) were limited, suggesting that the rate of invasive disease is truly rare. Of note, only half of the studies discussed their center's approach to surveillance imaging, which ranged from imaging and laboratories for "high risk" patients to specific imaging and time duration (i.e., ultrasound every 3 mo for 1 y, then yearly for 5 y) [4,15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barriers to the development of treatment algorithms in children include the rarity of the disease with limited singleinstitution experience and a lack of a defined natural history of these tumors [3]. Additionally, comparison to adult literature has limitations as these tumors behave differently in children [4,5]. At our institution, postoperative management guidelines have been developed for patients with acute appendicitis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extent of surgical resection in case of suspected malignancy depends on the location and size of the appendicular mass [150154]. Routine inclusion of the meso-appendix with the appendectomy is advised.…”
Section: Intra-operative Unexpected Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In cases of a NET > 1 cm, LAMN grade 3–4 or an adenocarcinoma of the appendix, a formal right hemicolectomy is indicated to provide an oncologically sufficient resection. It is advised to perform a total meso-appendicular resection at the primary operation and an additional hemicolectomy at a later stage when indicated (Tables 5, 6, 7, 8) [150154]. …”
Section: Intra-operative Unexpected Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6] WHO released the present classification system for the digestive system based on histologic grade in 2010. [57] This classification divides NETs into well differentiated, including low-grade (G1) and intermediate-grade (G2) neuroendocrine neoplasms, and poorly differentiated, high-grade (G3) neuroendocrine carcinoma. This present classification system brought the WHO system more closely in line with other widely used systems including the European Neuro Endocrine Tumors (ENETs) classification system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%