Robotics: Science and Systems X 2014
DOI: 10.15607/rss.2014.x.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Appearance-based Active, Monocular, Dense Reconstruction for Micro Aerial Vehicles

Abstract: Abstract-In this paper, we investigate the following problem: given the image of a scene, what is the trajectory that a robotmounted camera should follow to allow optimal dense depth estimation? The solution we propose is based on maximizing the information gain over a set of candidate trajectories. In order to estimate the information that we expect from a camera pose, we introduce a novel formulation of the measurement uncertainty that accounts for the scene appearance (i.e., texture in the reference view), … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research on the Next-Best-View problem and conceptually similar problems in Active Vision dates back several decades Aloimonos et al (1988), Bajcsy (1988) but remains an active area of research Forster et al (2014). The most frequently referenced surveys of the field include an overview of early approaches by Scott et al (2003) and an overview of more recent work by Chen et al (2011).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Research on the Next-Best-View problem and conceptually similar problems in Active Vision dates back several decades Aloimonos et al (1988), Bajcsy (1988) but remains an active area of research Forster et al (2014). The most frequently referenced surveys of the field include an overview of early approaches by Scott et al (2003) and an overview of more recent work by Chen et al (2011).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They rely on knowledge of the geometry and appearance of the object, which may not be available in many real world scenarios. Non-model based approaches use relaxed assumptions about the structure of the object, but the required information for planning the next best view must be estimated online based on the gathered data Banta et al (1995), Forster et al (2014). We utilize a non-model based approach since we do not assume anything about the object aside from its spatial bounds.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Forster et al [5] use depth uncertainty to estimate the best areas of the map to explore but are limited to relatively simple scenes. Hoppe et al [10] create a full network of poses for an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV), but assumes prior knowledge of the environment.…”
Section: Next-best View (Nbv) Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, very large values start to suffer from increasing depth error due to the relatively narrow baseline. Choosing values of α ∈ [5,7], corresponding to a vergence angle of around 9 • degrees, achieves high coverage while minimising the average error. It is important to note that these results are not dependent on the absolute values of depth, baseline or vergence.…”
Section: Parameter Explorationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently it has been applied successfully to dense 3D reconstruction [8], image-based rendering [7], image matching [32] and even used with RGBD data for object detection [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%