Parapsychology 2004
DOI: 10.4324/9780203334492-18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Apparitions and encounters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For cases of spontaneous anomalous experience during bereavement to become of interest to theorists and researchers of survival, we would expect there to be key features of the experience which would suggest something more than a subjective nature and perhaps purely illusory creation (created either consciously or unconsciously due to loss and longing for the deceased's return)this is in accordance with the conclusions made by Gurney and Myers (1889). Even though there is a large amount of literature and research, documenting and discussing accounts of anomalous phenomena suggesting survival (to cite but a few: Baird, 1944;Berger, 1988;Betty, 2016;Fontana, 2005;Gurney, Myers, & Podmore, 1886;McAdams & Bayless, 1981;Myers, 1903;Robertson, 2013;Rogo, 1986;Thomas, 1929) the case for survival as a whole is far too extensive to discuss in any depth or fair summary in a single book chapter (as previously noted by Gauld, 2005). However, here we are specifically concerned with cases suggesting survival during a period that could be considered bereavement for the experient, which are arguably limited within the available literature against other cases suggestive of survival (e.g., experiences prior to the knowledge of loss, mediumship, reincarnation events).…”
Section: Cases Of Potential Evidence For Survivalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For cases of spontaneous anomalous experience during bereavement to become of interest to theorists and researchers of survival, we would expect there to be key features of the experience which would suggest something more than a subjective nature and perhaps purely illusory creation (created either consciously or unconsciously due to loss and longing for the deceased's return)this is in accordance with the conclusions made by Gurney and Myers (1889). Even though there is a large amount of literature and research, documenting and discussing accounts of anomalous phenomena suggesting survival (to cite but a few: Baird, 1944;Berger, 1988;Betty, 2016;Fontana, 2005;Gurney, Myers, & Podmore, 1886;McAdams & Bayless, 1981;Myers, 1903;Robertson, 2013;Rogo, 1986;Thomas, 1929) the case for survival as a whole is far too extensive to discuss in any depth or fair summary in a single book chapter (as previously noted by Gauld, 2005). However, here we are specifically concerned with cases suggesting survival during a period that could be considered bereavement for the experient, which are arguably limited within the available literature against other cases suggestive of survival (e.g., experiences prior to the knowledge of loss, mediumship, reincarnation events).…”
Section: Cases Of Potential Evidence For Survivalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been argued by Gauld (2005) that it is by no means clear or agreed upon, as to what exactly would constitute evidence for survival of death. Some people are too quick to jump to conclusions of evidence for survival from experiences (and in bereavement events that is understandable on the part of the bereaved), while for other people, no amount of empirical findings would personally convince them of survival.…”
Section: Thoughts On the Reality Of Survivalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radioactivity distribution calculation is performed with activation calculation code, ORIGEN-S [12]. When we calculate radioactivity with the code, we need to set an appropriate neutron flux to the code.…”
Section: Radioactivity Distribution [3][4][5] 41 Overview Of Radioact...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…His previous book (Gauld, 1982) of early mediumship has been the source of authoritative, eminently reasonable, and non-dogmatic source of what the early trance (or mental) mediumship, studied mostly by the Society for Psychical Research, suggested about the possibility of survival. I will no longer recommend that book as the first choice because Gauld's new book surpasses it by going into greater detail and more thorough argumentation, demolishing on the way ignorant, nonsensical, and dogmatic critiques.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%