2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1474-919x.2010.01079.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Apparent survival and return rate of breeders in the southern temperate White‐rumped Swallow Tachycineta leucorrhoa

Abstract: Life‐histories and demographic parameters of southern temperate bird species have been little studied. We estimated return rates between years and sexes, and adult apparent survival and recapture probabilities with mark–recapture data on White‐rumped Swallows and found a lower return rate of unsuccessful females. There was little support for influences of sex or year on survival rates. The estimates were equivalent to the lowest value reported for a northern congener, in contrast to the prediction of geographi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(40 reference statements)
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Males’ return rate was unaffected by treatments, as was earlier determined for both species (Shutler et al 2006, Bulit and Massoni 2011). Even though return rates do not accurately reflect adult survival, the returns rates found on this study agree with previous return rates described for this species in the same field‐site: 43.5% for females (59% for successful females) and 42% for males (Bulit and Massoni 2011). The reduced sample size of the present study did not allow us to estimate apparent survival based on model selection procedures and capture‐recapture data.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Males’ return rate was unaffected by treatments, as was earlier determined for both species (Shutler et al 2006, Bulit and Massoni 2011). Even though return rates do not accurately reflect adult survival, the returns rates found on this study agree with previous return rates described for this species in the same field‐site: 43.5% for females (59% for successful females) and 42% for males (Bulit and Massoni 2011). The reduced sample size of the present study did not allow us to estimate apparent survival based on model selection procedures and capture‐recapture data.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…We found no difference in the return rate of males and females exposed to different treatments, as was also described in the case of tree swallows (Murphy et al 2000, Shutler et al 2006). In a previous study we found that successful females were more likely to return than unsuccessful ones (Bulit and Massoni 2011), a frequent pattern described for birds (Greenwood and Harvey 1982, Clark and Shutler 1999, Winkler et al 2004, but see Shutler and Clark 2003). Given that a greater percentage of enlarged nests failed completely, we expected to find smaller return rates in females that had raised those broods; instead, the return rate was similar to that of females who raised reduced broods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 3 more Smart Citations