1961
DOI: 10.1119/1.1937751
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Apparent Shape of Large Objects at Relativistic Speeds

Abstract: It has been recently recognized that there is a difference between the measured Lorentz contracted shape of an object moving at relativistic speed and the shape as seen by a single observer. The case of an object which subtends a small solid angle at the observer has been discussed by several authors. This paper discusses objects so large or so near that the subtended solid angle cannot be considered small, and gives simple proofs that spheres always present a circular outline and that straight lines may appea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Three of these are noted in the references [2,3,4] In the current study, the factors of greatest importance are the following: 1) the field of regard or field of view, extending from one degree to fifteen degrees, is not trivial, thus we are not dealing with differential subtended angles; 2) the observer always has some nonzero velocity with respect to the object(s) of view. For example, while motion may be in the same direction as a line joining two stars in one viewing, it always comparing the image as viewed by one moving observer with that as viewed by another moving observer, and never by an observer stationary with respect to the stars.…”
Section: Ieee Aes Systems Magazine September 1998mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Three of these are noted in the references [2,3,4] In the current study, the factors of greatest importance are the following: 1) the field of regard or field of view, extending from one degree to fifteen degrees, is not trivial, thus we are not dealing with differential subtended angles; 2) the observer always has some nonzero velocity with respect to the object(s) of view. For example, while motion may be in the same direction as a line joining two stars in one viewing, it always comparing the image as viewed by one moving observer with that as viewed by another moving observer, and never by an observer stationary with respect to the stars.…”
Section: Ieee Aes Systems Magazine September 1998mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Apart from a previously disregarded article by Lampa 2 in 1924 about the invisibility of the Lorentz contraction, the ®rst solutions to this problem were given by Penrose 3 and Terrell 4 in 1959. Later, this issue was addressed in more detail by Weisskopf, 5 Boas, 6 Scott and Viner 7 and Scott and van Driel. 8 Hsiung and Dunn 9 are the ®rst to use advanced visualization techniques for image shading of fastmoving objects.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…radiance has to be considered according to equations (1) and (6). For ®nal image synthesis, three tristimulus values RGB can be obtained from the wavelength-dependent radiance that reaches the eye point.…”
Section: The Rendering Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from a previously disregarded article by Lampa [1924] about the invisibility of the Lorentz contraction, the first solutions to this problem were given by Penrose [1959] and Terrell [1959]. Various aspects were discussed by Weisskopf [1960]; Boas [1961]; Scott and Viner [1965]; Scott and van Driel [1970]; and Kraus [2000]. Hsiung and Dunn [1989] were the first to use advanced visualization techniques for image shading of fast moving objects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%