2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ando.2019.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Apparent resistance to thyroid hormones: From biological interference to genetics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, biological interference was suspected in 26 % of cases without genetic variant, in which the biological discrepancy was not confirmed by a second analytical technique (15/58). Finally, no etiology for the biological discrepancy could be found in 24 % of cases (14/58) [10], as it occurred in one of our cases. They stated that patients in whom biological discrepancy was due to analytic interference were more often asymptomatic, and patients with no identified etiology tended to be older [10], whilst we show one young patient with this condition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 48%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…On the other hand, biological interference was suspected in 26 % of cases without genetic variant, in which the biological discrepancy was not confirmed by a second analytical technique (15/58). Finally, no etiology for the biological discrepancy could be found in 24 % of cases (14/58) [10], as it occurred in one of our cases. They stated that patients in whom biological discrepancy was due to analytic interference were more often asymptomatic, and patients with no identified etiology tended to be older [10], whilst we show one young patient with this condition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…Regarding the diagnosis, it would be recommendable to conduct a second thyroid function test (TSH, free T4, and free T3) with a different assay, and then screening for a genetic variant by sequencing the genes involved in thyroid hormone regulation, action and transport (THRB,THRA, SECISBP2, SLC16A, ALB, TTR, SERPI-NA7) [3,10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The main source of uncertainty was the conflicting results of TFTs in two affected individuals, who were revealed to actually have high fT3 and fT4 levels only when measured by alternative one-step immunoassays such as Roche and Beckman and one two-step method (Wallac DELFIA Perkin-Elmer), while normal TFTs were observed on Siemens and Vitros platforms. It is generally believed that, in patients with suspect of central hyperthyroidism, the presence of inconsistent results between different assay methods should be attributed to spurious hyperthyroxinemia due to serum interference [13]. Conversely, to the best of our knowledge, an underestimation of fT3 and fT4 in patients with a genuine central hyperthyroidism has never been described so far.…”
Section: Discussion/conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%