2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00449-019-02239-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Apparent protein cloud point temperature determination using a low volume high-throughput cryogenic device in combination with automated imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The protein cloud-point temperature was determined using the setup as described by Klijn et al [18]. This setup employs a cryogenic device (EF600M 105, Grant Instruments, Cambridgeshire, UK) and a GoPro Hero4 camera (GoPro Inc., San Mateo, CA, USA) for image acquisition.…”
Section: Image Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The protein cloud-point temperature was determined using the setup as described by Klijn et al [18]. This setup employs a cryogenic device (EF600M 105, Grant Instruments, Cambridgeshire, UK) and a GoPro Hero4 camera (GoPro Inc., San Mateo, CA, USA) for image acquisition.…”
Section: Image Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The temperature at which LLPS is detected is mainly determined by protein-protein interaction strength, where higher T Cloud values are found for strong attractive forces and low T Cloud values for weaker attractive forces [5]. The accompanying increase in solution turbidity when LLPS occurs is a characteristic that is often exploited for T Cloud measurements by means of spectroscopic methods [6,7], light scattering detection [5,[8][9][10][11][12][13], or imaging and microscopy [14][15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations