2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2018.05.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Apparent permeability model for gas transport in shale reservoirs with nano-scale porous media

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As analyzed in the aforementioned context, there are some differences in gas transport capacity for nanopores with different pore shapes. However, to date, nearly all of the production prediction models or related commercial software for shale gas recovery are based on a frequently utilized assumption; i.e., nanopore cross-sections in shale matrix are circles. In order to enhance the rationality and accuracy of current production prediction models, it is necessary to take the effect of pore shapes on gas transport capacity into account, which directly affects gas production performance. In this section, the error caused by assuming nanopores with elliptical nanopores as circular nanopores will be quantified.…”
Section: Discussion About the Frequently Utilized Assumption In Shale...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As analyzed in the aforementioned context, there are some differences in gas transport capacity for nanopores with different pore shapes. However, to date, nearly all of the production prediction models or related commercial software for shale gas recovery are based on a frequently utilized assumption; i.e., nanopore cross-sections in shale matrix are circles. In order to enhance the rationality and accuracy of current production prediction models, it is necessary to take the effect of pore shapes on gas transport capacity into account, which directly affects gas production performance. In this section, the error caused by assuming nanopores with elliptical nanopores as circular nanopores will be quantified.…”
Section: Discussion About the Frequently Utilized Assumption In Shale...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32 • Organic and inorganic pores are arranged in parallel without transport from each other. [33][34][35] • Fluid transports in nanopores with a slip boundary condition and negligible capillary pressure.…”
Section: Conceptual Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li et al believed that it is debatable to superimpose the Knudsen diffusion and slip flow, or to superimpose the slip flow and surface diffusion, or to superimpose these three transport mechanisms in flow models. Since the shale gas mass transport mechanism was introduced from the theory of rarefied gas dynamics, the aerodynamic researcher also thought that, from the point of view of rarefied gas, slip flow was essentially the same as Knudsen diffusion, which was determined by the Boltzmann equation and gas-solid interaction, but the coefficients were different under different K n [37,38]. After that, Cai et al proposed a very interesting apparent permeability model by accounting for three major fluid flow mechanisms in shale stratum, which is modeled as a 3D fractal media.…”
Section: Model Formulamentioning
confidence: 99%