Apparent Lack of Synergism between Heparin and Dihydroergotamine in Prevention of Deep Vein Thrombosis after Elective Hip Replacement: a Randomised Double-Blind Trial Reported in Conjunction with an Overview of Previous Results

Abstract

SummaryWe report the results of a double-blind, randomised trial of venous thrombosis (VT) prevention in 117 patients having elective hip replacement where low dose heparin alone (5,000 IU sodium heparin given subcutaneously [sc] 8 hourly until the seventh postoperative day) was compared with low dose heparin plus dihydroergotamine (DHE; 0.5 mg, given 8 hourly by sc injection). The trial end point consisted of VT discovered through bilateral ascending venography done routinely on the seventh postoperative day. VT developed in 34% of patients given heparin/DHE (95% confidence interval = 22% – 47%) compared with 24% in those given low dose heparin alone (95% confidence interval = 14% – 37%; p = 0.34), difference = 10% (95% confidence interval = –7% to +26%). Corresponding figures for the incidence of proximal (above-knee) thrombosis were 17% and 14% (95% confidence intervals = 8% – 29% and 6% – 25% respectively). These results are discussed in the context of a detailed overview of published evidence concerning VT prevention with heparin/DHE after hip replacement and we conclude it is unlikely that heparin/DHE is markedly superior to low dose heparin alone in this clinical setting.

Detecting the effects of thromboprophylaxis: the case of the rogue reviews

“…“Nearly two dozen,”5 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 answered Legge ruefully. “And this, Mr Holmes, is where my faith in meta-analysis wavers.…”