2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Apparent Fibre Density: A novel measure for the analysis of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
644
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 529 publications
(652 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
7
644
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Quantification is therefore better performed on the basis of, for example, other complementary track-based parameters, such as track-weighted apparent diffusion coefficient (TW-ADC), trackweighted fractional anisotropy (TW-FA), and track-weighted fiber-orientation distribution (TW-FOD), 12,17 or even on the basis of other properties of the streamlines themselves (such as their lengths in the average pathlength map [APM] method) 13 or on measures of the voxelwise fiber-orientation distribution (such as those related to the apparent fiber density [AFD] method). 14,18 While these maps have reduced anatomic contrast relative to that seen in TDI maps, they have more reliable quantitative properties 12,13 and are therefore more suitable for quantitative analysis in clinical applications.…”
Section: -14mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantification is therefore better performed on the basis of, for example, other complementary track-based parameters, such as track-weighted apparent diffusion coefficient (TW-ADC), trackweighted fractional anisotropy (TW-FA), and track-weighted fiber-orientation distribution (TW-FOD), 12,17 or even on the basis of other properties of the streamlines themselves (such as their lengths in the average pathlength map [APM] method) 13 or on measures of the voxelwise fiber-orientation distribution (such as those related to the apparent fiber density [AFD] method). 14,18 While these maps have reduced anatomic contrast relative to that seen in TDI maps, they have more reliable quantitative properties 12,13 and are therefore more suitable for quantitative analysis in clinical applications.…”
Section: -14mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While GFA is a global measure in each voxel, Ghosh and Deriche (2011) introduced a bundle specific metric using a polynomial approach in order to represent the dODF and extracted geometric information to define a peak FA. Similarly, Raffelt et al (2012b) as well as Dell' Acqua et al (2013) introduced the length of an fODF peak as bundle specific metric.…”
Section: Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such HR and UHR D W i m a g e s w i t h h i g h S N R c o u l d p r o v i d e a b e t t e r s e n s i t i v i t y f o r the study of brain microstructure (Mori and van Zijl, 2002;Mukherjee et al, 2008;Zeineh et al, 2012). Moreover, these images could play an important role in fiber tractography to enable tracking of finer bundles or to better handle the fiber crossing problem (Dyrby et al, 2011;Miller et al, 2011;Raffelt et al, 2012). However, the acquisition of such HR or UHR images remains a challenging problem in clinical conditions since improvement in resolution is obtained at the cost of either lower SNR, longer acquisition time or both.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%