1996
DOI: 10.1016/0044-8486(95)01217-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Apparent digestibility of selected ingredients in red drum (Sciaenops ocellatus) diets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

24
100
5
17

Year Published

1998
1998
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(150 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
24
100
5
17
Order By: Relevance
“…The differences between the apparent digestibility coefficients of this research and of other studies used for comparison can be attributed to several factors, such as the inclusion level of test ingredient, possible anti-nutritional factors or amino acid imbalance (Mukhopadhyay & Ray, 1997), the methodology used to collect feces (Sullivan & Reigh 1995), the fish line (Degani et al, 1997), the formulation and processing of feeds and ingredients (McGoogan & Reigh 1996), variety (Leterme et al, 1991) and even the soil where the beans are grown (Owsley et al, 1987).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differences between the apparent digestibility coefficients of this research and of other studies used for comparison can be attributed to several factors, such as the inclusion level of test ingredient, possible anti-nutritional factors or amino acid imbalance (Mukhopadhyay & Ray, 1997), the methodology used to collect feces (Sullivan & Reigh 1995), the fish line (Degani et al, 1997), the formulation and processing of feeds and ingredients (McGoogan & Reigh 1996), variety (Leterme et al, 1991) and even the soil where the beans are grown (Owsley et al, 1987).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O conhecimento da digestibilidade da energia e nutrien-tes dos alimentos permitem a formulação das rações de mínimo custo que atendam as exigências nutricionais dos animais (Sullivan & Reigh, 1995;McGoogan & Reigh, 1996;Aksnes & Opstvedt, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…High energy diets concur for a reduced protein and essential nutrients intake (CHOU; SHIAU, 1996;PEZZATO et al, 2001) and an increase on fat deposition in several fish species (MACGOOGAN;REIGH, 1996;MUKHOPADHYAY;RAY, 1997). On the other hand, diets with low energy content increase the use of protein as an energy source, increasing the feed efficiency ratio and the cost of production.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%