2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrnm.2015.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Apparent diffusion coefficient value in evaluating types, stages and histologic grading of cancer cervix

Abstract: Aim: To determine whether the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements calculated values were significantly different between cervical tumors with different histological characteristics (type, degree of differentiation, and stage of malignancy). Patients and methods: MRI and DWI scans performed in 26 pathologically proved cancer cervix patients. ADC values of different pathological types of cervical cancer were compared. Student's t test was used for statistical analysis. Results: There were 18 squamo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(19 reference statements)
1
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is may be attributed to the presence of necrosis and focal signal intensity changes as well as susceptibility artifacts. These result findings matched with many other studies which concluded the reported mean ADC values for both squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma cases to be less than 1 × 10 −3 mm 2 /s, averaging 0.88-0.91 × 10 −3 mm 2 /s, 0.8827 × 10 −3 mm 2 /s, and 0.72 ± 0.168 × 10 −3 mm 2 /s, respectively [23][24][25]. Also, Mahmoud SA concluded that in the present study, the mean ADC value for malignant lesions was 0.82 × 10 −3 ± 0.1 SD mm 2 /s [18], and Sherif HA et al stated that the mean ADC value of cervical carcinoma in our study was 0.82 × 10 −3 mm 2 /s [14].…”
Section: The Utility Of Dw-mri Versus Multiparametric Mri In the Characterization Of The Studied 60 Uterine Cervix Focal Lesionssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This is may be attributed to the presence of necrosis and focal signal intensity changes as well as susceptibility artifacts. These result findings matched with many other studies which concluded the reported mean ADC values for both squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma cases to be less than 1 × 10 −3 mm 2 /s, averaging 0.88-0.91 × 10 −3 mm 2 /s, 0.8827 × 10 −3 mm 2 /s, and 0.72 ± 0.168 × 10 −3 mm 2 /s, respectively [23][24][25]. Also, Mahmoud SA concluded that in the present study, the mean ADC value for malignant lesions was 0.82 × 10 −3 ± 0.1 SD mm 2 /s [18], and Sherif HA et al stated that the mean ADC value of cervical carcinoma in our study was 0.82 × 10 −3 mm 2 /s [14].…”
Section: The Utility Of Dw-mri Versus Multiparametric Mri In the Characterization Of The Studied 60 Uterine Cervix Focal Lesionssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Hasan et al . [17] in their study showed 69.2% of squamous cell carcinoma and 30.7% of adenocarcinoma cases. Atram et al .,[18] in their series, showed 82.8% of squamous cell carcinoma, 15.8% of adenocarcinoma, and 1.4% of adenosquamous carcinoma cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Similar findings were seen in a study conducted by Hasan et al . [17] Atram et al . [18] reported lymph node involvement in 34% and Karunya et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cervical cancer is one of the most common cancers in females worldwide. In the United States, its incidence and mortality rate has been declining due to the wide scale screenings, pap tests, and/or pap smear tests (25). The screening procedure can find cervical cancer early.…”
Section: Trends In Incidencementioning
confidence: 99%