2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2007.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Apparent and real roughness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Concerning the mineral dust grains as surrogates for ice particles, while the refractive index of mineral dust is higher, the difference in roughness that would be caused by such change is small: if dust is substituted for ice, the same speckle pattern should be obtained if dust roughness is 1.31/n m of that of ice (Ruiz Gale et al, 2007), where n m , the refractive index of mineral dust, is typically ≈ 1.52. So the dust particles may represent both the scattering properties and possibly also the shape of atmospheric ice crystal quite well, at least as far as solid (as opposed to hollow), simple (as opposed to branched or aggregated) crystals are concerned.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning the mineral dust grains as surrogates for ice particles, while the refractive index of mineral dust is higher, the difference in roughness that would be caused by such change is small: if dust is substituted for ice, the same speckle pattern should be obtained if dust roughness is 1.31/n m of that of ice (Ruiz Gale et al, 2007), where n m , the refractive index of mineral dust, is typically ≈ 1.52. So the dust particles may represent both the scattering properties and possibly also the shape of atmospheric ice crystal quite well, at least as far as solid (as opposed to hollow), simple (as opposed to branched or aggregated) crystals are concerned.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%