RS vs. Lab-based Thermal Maps
RESULTSSpectral emissivity depends on λ and T [7]: ε increases linearly with temperature at 10.9 μm (TIR), and changes non-linearly and with greater amplitude at 1.6 μm (SWIR).When lab-based emissivity maps are compared, derived ε values are higher in SWIR (0.9-1.0) than in TIR(0.8-0.9). High ε values are characteristic of molten lava (e.g., lava channel and levées are well visible) whereas lower ε values are characteristic of the lava flow surroundings (e.g., lava front).When Thermal maps are compared, T distribution varies between RS-and Lab-based thermal maps. Lava channel shows lower temperatures whereas levées and lava front show higher temperatures. The temperatures of the cooled surroundings remain constant.The mean di erence between RS-and lab-based thermal maps is ~50° for lava channel, while is greater for lava levées and lower for cooled surroundings.
METHODSpectral emissivity of basaltic magma from the 2014-2015 Holuhraun eruption was measured in situ. Spectra were systematically acquired over a wide spectral range (400-8000 cm −1 ) covering TIR, MIR and SWIR, and up to ~1800 K using IR emission apparatus [4]. Then, we transformed the ε-T relationship into equations at two wavelengths of interest for RS; 10.9 μm (TIR), and 1.6 μm (SWIR). Finally, we implemented these equations in Aufaristama et al. (2018) [5] thermal model and run the refined model as follow: 1-First iteration with constant ε (0.97) to determine T. 2-Creation of emissivity map for each band using T to calculate ε. 3-Second iteration with ε calculate to refine lava flow T.