2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-021-03789-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

App-based rehabilitation program after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract: Introduction New app-based programs for postoperative rehabilitation have been developed, but no long-term study has been published to date. Thus, a prospective randomized control trial with 2-year follow-up was performed to evaluate the effectiveness of app-based rehabilitation (GenuSport) compared to a control group after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods Between April and October 2016, 60 patients were enrolled in the study. Twenty-five patients we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our comparable results are in alignment with the randomized trial by Fleischman et al [38] who found no differences in knee range of motion at six months post-TKA between unsupervised home exercise implemented either by paper or web-based delivery versus clinic-based physical therapy. In a recent randomized trial, Bäcker et al [9] found no long-term differences in outcomes between a six-week app-based rehabilitation program and a regular physical therapy program. There is a small but growing base of evidence that app-based rehabilitation methods may be feasible in the home environment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our comparable results are in alignment with the randomized trial by Fleischman et al [38] who found no differences in knee range of motion at six months post-TKA between unsupervised home exercise implemented either by paper or web-based delivery versus clinic-based physical therapy. In a recent randomized trial, Bäcker et al [9] found no long-term differences in outcomes between a six-week app-based rehabilitation program and a regular physical therapy program. There is a small but growing base of evidence that app-based rehabilitation methods may be feasible in the home environment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The feasibility criterion of 75% computing device ownership and study use among potential study enrollees proved to be a high mark. Where other studies, including Chughtai et al [10], delivered an eHealth system to all participants [9] [10], we were interested in pre-existing computing device ownership and study use in the TKA population as an indicator of the potential for immediate adoption and implementation of the Health-in-Motion® app. While the percentage of computing device ownership and use among potential enrollees was fairly robust at 71.4%, it failed to meet our criterion of 75%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A different RCT compared adherence to home-based exercise between knee OA patients who used a mobile application and those who used handouts and found that those who used the mobile had a better adherence rate, lower VAS-pain scores, and stronger improvements of physical function and lower-limb muscle strength [ 28 ]. It is worthy to note that our trial assessed knee OA patients that did not require surgery; however, in the postoperative setting, the use of a mobile app during rehabilitation led to reduced opiate usage for pain management [ 11 ] and may become a promising tool in improving functional outcomes [ 29 ]. Thus, this developed mobile app has proven to be a valuable tool for OA patients for motivating patients to exercise, educating patients on disease progression and improving the accuracy of rehabilitation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonadherence is a multidimensional process not easily solved including internal factors (such as patient’s locus of control, depression, belief in importance of activities) and external factors (such as supportive environment and access to transportation) [ 1 , 6 ]. Digital delivery of HEPs has already been shown to enhance patient adherence [ 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 ] and with the relatively high rate of smartphone ownership [ 12 ] there is a growing body of work investigating the use of smartphones, apps, and sensing technologies to facilitate rehabilitation and remote care [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 ]. However there has been limited study of implementation of mobile health applications in routine care settings [ 13 , 16 ], and most efforts have focused on specific medical conditions [ 15 ] or have a limited set of exercises which can be performed using the system [ 16 , 17 , 18 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%