2014
DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004569
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Apoplastic Venom Allergen-like Proteins of Cyst Nematodes Modulate the Activation of Basal Plant Innate Immunity by Cell Surface Receptors

Abstract: Despite causing considerable damage to host tissue during the onset of parasitism, nematodes establish remarkably persistent infections in both animals and plants. It is thought that an elaborate repertoire of effector proteins in nematode secretions suppresses damage-triggered immune responses of the host. However, the nature and mode of action of most immunomodulatory compounds in nematode secretions are not well understood. Here, we show that venom allergen-like proteins of plant-parasitic nematodes selecti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
101
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
(120 reference statements)
3
101
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this protein is not essential for virulence on tomato (15). Gr-Vap1, a CAP protein from the potato cyst nematode Globodera rostochiensis, on the other hand, induces the loss of basal immunity to unrelated pathogens when heterologously expressed in plants (16). In addition, the knock-down of GrVap1 expression reduces the infectivity of nematode, indicating that this protein is important for pathogen-induced suppression of plant defense.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this protein is not essential for virulence on tomato (15). Gr-Vap1, a CAP protein from the potato cyst nematode Globodera rostochiensis, on the other hand, induces the loss of basal immunity to unrelated pathogens when heterologously expressed in plants (16). In addition, the knock-down of GrVap1 expression reduces the infectivity of nematode, indicating that this protein is important for pathogen-induced suppression of plant defense.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, we propose that gender-enriched transcription profiles for Hc-cap-36 and Hc-cap-37 (females) or Hc-cap-38 (males) in haematophagous stages relate also to reproductive and/or developmental processes. A recent molecular investigation (Lozano-Torres et al, 2014) has shown that the silencing of a gene of Globodera rostochiensis (potato cyst nematode) with ~35% homology to Hc-cap-38 suppressed the activation of plant host defences, indicating a role of at least some CAP protein gene homologs in immune modulation.…”
Section: Single-domain Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies with G. rostochiensis showed that Gr‐VAP‐1 proteins suppress plant immunity and knockdown of this gene reduced nematode infection of potatoes (Lozano‐Torres et al ., ). In addition, it was shown that the vap‐1 gene is potentially associated with the induction of a host immune response and resistance because it triggers a Cf‐2/Rcr3pim‐dependent programmed cell death in tomato plants; it can also suppress the cell death caused by the extracellular receptor protein Cf‐4/Avr‐4, which is a cell surface immune receptor (Lozano‐Torres et al ., , ). Phylogenetic studies with the predicted protein sequences of VAP‐1 between M. hispanica and several other species of PPNs revealed a high degree of conservation (Duarte et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Phylogenetic studies with the predicted protein sequences of VAP‐1 between M. hispanica and several other species of PPNs revealed a high degree of conservation (Duarte et al ., ). The Mi‐VAP‐1 shows about 28.6% of identity to Gr‐VAP‐1 (Lozano‐Torres et al ., ). Recently, the vap‐1 gene was localized, by in situ hybridization, in the subventral oesophageal gland cells of M. hispanica J2 and it was shown that tomato root exudates induce transcriptional changes of this gene in the pre‐parasitic J2, causing its up‐regulation even before nematodes penetrate the tomato roots (Duarte et al ., , ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation