2021
DOI: 10.1007/s12630-021-02005-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Apophenia and anesthesia: how we sometimes change our practice prematurely

Abstract: Human beings are predisposed to identifying false patterns in statistical noise, a likely survival advantage during our evolutionary development. Moreover, humans seem to prefer “positive” results over “negative” ones. These two cognitive features lay a framework for premature adoption of falsely positive studies. Added to this predisposition is the tendency of journals to “overbid” for exciting or newsworthy manuscripts, incentives in both the academic and publishing industries that value change over truth an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although evidence is accumulating, gaps remain: the size and clinical significance of the effect in some cases; the lack of an appropriate comparator or use of multimodal analgesia in others; the need for more attention to functional outcomes, duration of analgesic blockade and the role of catheters; and prevention of CPSP. While these issues should not necessarily negate our enthusiasm for ESP and serratus anterior plane blocks, particularly if the alternative is no block, it is important we also acknowledge that eagerness to adopt new techniques sometimes outpaces the evidence, the reasons for which are complex [23]. We must maintain a healthy level of scrutiny for any novel technique but it is exciting as regional enthusiasts to see the evidence for chest wall fascial plane blocks increasing.…”
Section: Clinical Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although evidence is accumulating, gaps remain: the size and clinical significance of the effect in some cases; the lack of an appropriate comparator or use of multimodal analgesia in others; the need for more attention to functional outcomes, duration of analgesic blockade and the role of catheters; and prevention of CPSP. While these issues should not necessarily negate our enthusiasm for ESP and serratus anterior plane blocks, particularly if the alternative is no block, it is important we also acknowledge that eagerness to adopt new techniques sometimes outpaces the evidence, the reasons for which are complex [23]. We must maintain a healthy level of scrutiny for any novel technique but it is exciting as regional enthusiasts to see the evidence for chest wall fascial plane blocks increasing.…”
Section: Clinical Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detecting small differences between treatment and control groups requires especially large sampling 71 , 72 , 80 . This is absolutely required to avoid false positive findings due to human inherited ability to apophenia (the “tendency to perceive meaning in noise”) 81 . We can illustrate this ability by taking control distribution of normalized residuals and fitting this data to different mathematical models (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The human brain, however, has an aversion to accept randomness, but instead always tries to derive a meaning (Rominger et al, 2022), for example by assigning purpose to incidental patterns where there is actually none (Gladwell, 2005;Hanson et al, 2021). For the web decoration phenomenon this is interesting insofar as there are studies suggesting that these structures may well have no function and shaped into a reproducible pattern by non-intentional processes (Walter and Elgar, 2016; see also discussion below).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%