Aplication of Low Level Laser in Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs)

Rahimi, Arash; Kosarieh, Emad; Rabeie, S; Mojahedi, M; ashari, M. Assna

doi:10.4317/medoral.17643782

Cited by 8 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…TMJ pain is considered the most common cause of chronic orofacial pain that is excruciating in nature [2]. The TMJ has been a source of interest for many centuries [3].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative evaluation of low-level laser therapy and ultrasound heat therapy in reducing temporomandibular joint disorder pain

Khairnar

Bhate

Kumar

et al. 2019

J Dent Anesth Pain Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundPain, limitations in opening, asymmetrical jaw movements, and temporomandibular joint (TMJ) sounds are the most common findings in temporomandibular joint disorders (TMDs), which causes excruciating pain, inflammation of the surrounding muscles, posterior fibers, and synovial fluid. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the effects of ultrasound heat therapy and low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in reducing TMD-related pain.MethodsThis prospective study included 42 patients (age range, 25–45 years), who were divided into two groups of 21 patients each. All patients were prescribed a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) twice a day for 5 days for temporary relief of pain prior to the commencement of treatment. Patients were kept on a soft diet and asked to restrict mouth opening during the same period. Fifteen sessions of LLLT (Group A) or ultrasound therapy (Group B) were administered to the affected side.ResultsPost-therapy, the mean visual analog scale score for group A and group B was 4.81 (2.01) and 6.19 (1.20), respectively; the difference was statistically significant and favoring the LLLT group. Similarly, the mean mouth opening for group A and group B was 3.99 (0.40) and 3.65 (0.41), respectively; the difference was statistically significant and favoring the LLLT group.ConclusionOur study recommends LLLT for treating TMD-related pain with no underlying bony pathology.

show abstract

“…TMJ pain is considered the most common cause of chronic orofacial pain that is excruciating in nature [2]. The TMJ has been a source of interest for many centuries [3].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative evaluation of low-level laser therapy and ultrasound heat therapy in reducing temporomandibular joint disorder pain

Khairnar

Bhate

Kumar

et al. 2019

J Dent Anesth Pain Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…LLLT (wavelength: 904 nm, mean output power: 0.6 W, duration: 60 seconds, dosage: 6 J/cm 2 ) was applied to all the tender points selected during examination. (18,19) The subjects and the clinician used protective eyewear. The therapeutic LLLT application was achieved through direct contact of the probe to the skin.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Clinical outcomes of low level laser therapy (LLLT) in the management of temporomandibular joint disorders

2017

Al-Azhar Journal of Dental Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Temporomandibular disorder (TMD) is a collective term for a number of clinical signs and symptoms involving the masticatory muscles, the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), and associated structures. 1 pain relief and reestablishment of normal jaw function are the main goals of conservative (noninvasive or minimally invasive) management of (TMD). These have ranged from occlusal adjustment, splint therapy, arthrocentesis, arthroscopy, laser therapy, acupuncture, cryotherapy, and physical exercises. Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) has been used for pain control and healing. Use of LLLT for TMD has been controversial, and shortcomings have been found in previous studies. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of (LLLT) in the treatment of (TMD) in relation to pain intensity and jaw movements. In this randomized, double-blind clinical trial, 40 patients with TMDs were randomly divided into laser and placebo groups 20 patients in each. In the laser group, twenty patients received 6 sessions of LLLT (2 times a week for 3 weeks) with semi conductive diode laser (gallium arsenide; 904 nm, 0.6 W, 60 s, 4 J/cm2). The same procedure was done with the 20 patients of the control group but by using inactive beaming light. Pain intensity, and range of motion were assessed before and immediately after 1, 2 and 3 weeks, 1, 3 and 6 months. Statistically significant results were achieved in all study parameters. It was concluded that LLLT promoted satisfactory results in reducing the pain intensity, and improvement in the range of jaw motion. Hence it is an effective and efficient treatment method for TMDs.

show abstract

“…These reactions indicate the biostimulation effect of therapeutic laser [13] . The analgesic effect of Low level Laser radiation has correlation with the increase of beta endorphin in cerebrospinal fluid and normalization of the telethermographic state of the inflamed tissue [14].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 94%

Assessment of low level diode laser therapy versus arthrocentesis in management of temporomandibular joint internal derangement

Hammuda

2018

OMX

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Many nonsurgical therapies have been suggested for the management of Disc derangement disorders such as physical therapy, pharmacologic therapy, through psychological counselling, cognitive behavioural therapy, occlusal splints and acupuncture. Among physical therapy procedures, low level laser therapy (LLLT) has recently been proposed to reduce symptoms and improve function in TMD patients. Aim: The aim of this study is to evaluate effectiveness of Low level diode laser therapy as a treatment modality in temporomandibular joint internal derangement. Patients/Methods: Thirty six patients presented with jaw pain, clicking and limited mouth openings were involved in this study. Clinical, radiographic and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were performed to exclude muscular, hyperplastic or degenerative causes. They were divided randomly into two groups. group I, subjected to arthrocentesis and group II, subjected to ten sessions of LLLT on fixed predetermined points. Results: Statistical analysis has shown a significant improvement in both groups after six month regarding Pain, range of mandibular movements and clicking. In comparison between both groups the change in maximal mouth opening (MMO) and clicking was higher in arthrocentesis group than LLLT group.

show abstract

Aplication of Low Level Laser in Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs)

Cited by 8 publications

References 0 publications

Comparative evaluation of low-level laser therapy and ultrasound heat therapy in reducing temporomandibular joint disorder pain

Comparative evaluation of low-level laser therapy and ultrasound heat therapy in reducing temporomandibular joint disorder pain

Clinical outcomes of low level laser therapy (LLLT) in the management of temporomandibular joint disorders

Assessment of low level diode laser therapy versus arthrocentesis in management of temporomandibular joint internal derangement

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About