“…Several studies have reported that MTA yielded a significantly higher frequency of mineralized bridge formation, thicker and less porous dentin, and less periapical inflammation than calcium hydroxide 5,6) . It has also been reported that MTA induces migration and proliferation of osteogenic and odontoblastic cells, which, in turn, promotes mineralized tissue deposition, reducing inflammation in its site of action 4,6,8) . Such a protocol, combining the use of these two biomaterials (calcium hydroxide and MTA) in treating teeth with incomplete root formation, has been reported to offer favorable outcomes [1][2][3] , and the present results support the findings of these earlier studies.…”