2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2015.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

APHIS: A new software for photo-matching in ecological studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
39
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
39
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Together with specification of whole-animal traits (e.g., sex, age class), this considerably reduced the number of images to be compared visually. Alternatively, automatic pattern recognition by image comparison software (e.g., Bolger et al, 2012;Hartog & Reijns, 2014;Moya et al, 2015) could be used. However, application of this method to reptile scalation patterns requires the digitization of reference points on each photograph (Sacchi, Scali, Mangiacotti, Sannolo, & Zuffi, 2016;Sacchi et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Together with specification of whole-animal traits (e.g., sex, age class), this considerably reduced the number of images to be compared visually. Alternatively, automatic pattern recognition by image comparison software (e.g., Bolger et al, 2012;Hartog & Reijns, 2014;Moya et al, 2015) could be used. However, application of this method to reptile scalation patterns requires the digitization of reference points on each photograph (Sacchi, Scali, Mangiacotti, Sannolo, & Zuffi, 2016;Sacchi et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Photographs are stored in a (digital) library to facilitate cross-matching of the images. Potential matches of the individually unique natural marks can be detected and evaluated by eye or by photo-identification software (e.g., Van Tienhoven, Den Hartog, & Reijns, 2007;Sacchi et al, 2010;Bolger, Morrison, Vance, Lee, & Farid, 2012;Hartog & Reijns, 2014;Moya et al, 2015). Photographic identification by natural markings is especially appropriate when live animals are difficult to capture (e.g., large marine and terrestrial mammals), or when capture and handling cause severe stress to the study organisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…to camera‐based wildlife assessment may represent a paradigm change in the current technological era. For example, photo identification (Moya et al., ) may become the input for spatial capture–recapture models (Chandler & Royle, ). Concerning marine wildlife assessment, conventional methods (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tags however, may cause problems associated with physical or behavioural disruptions of normal processes (Speed et al, ). As an alternative or supplement to conventional methods, photo‐identification (photo‐ID) using natural markings, morphological features or scars offer a non‐invasive way to collect individual data (Speed et al, ; van Tienhoven et al, ; Moya et al, ; Barría et al, ). Despite some limitations related to its technical application, photo‐ID has been increasingly used in elasmobranch studies (Castro & Rosa, ; van Tienhoven et al, ; Holmberg et al, ; Luiz et al, ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(c)]. The second aspect that makes this photo‐ID method useful is that the user visually chooses the matching individual among different options suggested by the algorithm at the end of the process, reducing potential errors if the match is provided automatically by the software (van Tienhoven et al, ; Moya et al, ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%