2012
DOI: 10.1029/2011je003940
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aphelion water‐ice cloud mapping and property retrieval using the OMEGA imaging spectrometer onboard Mars Express

Abstract: [1] Mapping of the aphelion clouds over the Tharsis plateau and retrieval of their particle size and visible opacity are made possible by the OMEGA imaging spectrometer aboard Mars Express. Observations cover the period from MY26 L s = 330 to MY29 L s = 180and are acquired at various local times, ranging from 8 AM to 6 PM. Cloud maps of the Tharsis region constructed using the 3.1 mm ice absorption band reveal the seasonal and diurnal evolution of aphelion clouds. Four distinct types of clouds are identified: … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
49
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
(117 reference statements)
2
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The resulting output parameters g 1 , g 2 and α varied in the order of 4%, 25% and 2%, respectively, with respect to the nominal scenario Sensitivity to presence of water-ice clouds. Part of the observations used in this study were obtained during the aphelion season (centred on L s ~ 70º) and the possible presence of water-ice clouds from the aphelion cloud belt, developing around L s = 40º -60º and dissipating near L s ~ 150º (e.g., Clancy et al, 1996Clancy et al, , 2003Madeleine et al, 2012) might introduce deviations in the dust phase function parameters retrieval. Although the majority of the observations were taken before 7h or after 16h (LTST), when detections of water-ice clouds are very low and the reported optical depth is almost negligible (Kloos et al, 2018), the sensitivity of the results to this phenomenon was evaluated.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting output parameters g 1 , g 2 and α varied in the order of 4%, 25% and 2%, respectively, with respect to the nominal scenario Sensitivity to presence of water-ice clouds. Part of the observations used in this study were obtained during the aphelion season (centred on L s ~ 70º) and the possible presence of water-ice clouds from the aphelion cloud belt, developing around L s = 40º -60º and dissipating near L s ~ 150º (e.g., Clancy et al, 1996Clancy et al, , 2003Madeleine et al, 2012) might introduce deviations in the dust phase function parameters retrieval. Although the majority of the observations were taken before 7h or after 16h (LTST), when detections of water-ice clouds are very low and the reported optical depth is almost negligible (Kloos et al, 2018), the sensitivity of the results to this phenomenon was evaluated.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[95] We assume the size of ice particles is about 10 μm (a conservative estimate between the common size encountered in Martian water-ice clouds [Madeleine et al, 2012] and the fast-falling ice particles detected by Whiteway et al [2009]). We also assume that the extinction coefficient is~2.…”
Section: Calculation Of Concentration and Fluxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Water ice (as clouds in the atmosphere or as surface frost) significantly affects the radiance observed from orbit in the 3 μm spectral region [e.g., Vincendon et al, 2011;Madeleine et al, 2012]. As we aim to quantify the hydration of ice-free surfaces, the 1.5 μm band depth described in Langevin et al [2007] is used to detect icy frost presence at the surface and thick clouds in the atmosphere.…”
Section: Impact Of Surface and Atmospheric Volatilesmentioning
confidence: 99%