2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-019-09259-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aphasia outcome: the interactions between initial severity, lesion size and location

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
27
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The NIHSS score predicted performance on all NAVS-G and NAT-G subsets (Tables 5-8), as did aphasia severity and spontaneous speech competence. It is well-known that NIHSS reflects clinical severity as well as the severity of aphasia, and it has been shown to correlate with the prognosis for stroke-induced aphasia [230][231][232]. Surprisingly, we did not find a relation between NIHSS and NAVS-G and NAT-G performance in the RHSP group.…”
Section: The Covariates "Clinical Scores"contrasting
confidence: 84%
“…The NIHSS score predicted performance on all NAVS-G and NAT-G subsets (Tables 5-8), as did aphasia severity and spontaneous speech competence. It is well-known that NIHSS reflects clinical severity as well as the severity of aphasia, and it has been shown to correlate with the prognosis for stroke-induced aphasia [230][231][232]. Surprisingly, we did not find a relation between NIHSS and NAVS-G and NAT-G performance in the RHSP group.…”
Section: The Covariates "Clinical Scores"contrasting
confidence: 84%
“…Conversely, we present evidence that different factors may account for the early phases of recovery, and more specifically, influence the spontaneous recovery. Previous studies have reported that initial aphasia severity, isolated or in combination with other biological measures, can account for a large amount of variance in the long term (13,17). It has been also shown that different white matter structures may be involved in the outcome of aphasia at different stages, although this has not been explored during early recovery (50).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the results were clear, this study evaluated patients with only mild to moderate aphasia, which neglects those patients with more severe language deficits in which recovery results are more difficult to capture. A recent study found evidence that the interaction between severity and other variables may be different in patients with more severe aphasia (17). Inclusion of patients with severe aphasia entails more difficulty in the analysis of data, but is necessary to picture a more realistic and clinically relevant scenario (12).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar impairments have been noted in patients with damage to the posterior regions of the temporal lobes (Campanella et al, 2014). Additional studies have noted that damage to the temporoparietal regions also leads to deficits in bodily awareness (Martinaud et al, 2017) and language comprehension (e.g., Benghanem et al, 2019), which would include the ability to describe one’s experiences. Again, these functions are related to present-moment awareness of one’s thoughts and bodily experiences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%