2008
DOI: 10.1063/1.2839023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aperture tolerances for neutron-imaging systems in inertial confinement fusion

Abstract: Neutron-imaging systems are being considered as an ignition diagnostic for the National Ignition Facility (NIF) [Hogan et al., Nucl. Fusion 41, 567 (2001)]. Given the importance of these systems, a neutron-imaging design tool is being used to quantify the effects of aperture fabrication and alignment tolerances on reconstructed neutron images for inertial confinement fusion. The simulations indicate that alignment tolerances of more than 1 mrad would introduce measurable features in a reconstructed image for b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6,7,14 Since the PSF of the pinhole is not shift invariant, the reconstruction will change depending on where the source actually was relative to where we thought it was during the reconstruction since a different set of PSFs is used in the two cases. 6,7,14 Since the PSF of the pinhole is not shift invariant, the reconstruction will change depending on where the source actually was relative to where we thought it was during the reconstruction since a different set of PSFs is used in the two cases.…”
Section: Misalignment Uncertainty In Source Planementioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,7,14 Since the PSF of the pinhole is not shift invariant, the reconstruction will change depending on where the source actually was relative to where we thought it was during the reconstruction since a different set of PSFs is used in the two cases. 6,7,14 Since the PSF of the pinhole is not shift invariant, the reconstruction will change depending on where the source actually was relative to where we thought it was during the reconstruction since a different set of PSFs is used in the two cases.…”
Section: Misalignment Uncertainty In Source Planementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results were then compared with Monte-Carlo calculations performed with the GEANT4 toolkit [14]- [15]. Aperture alignment and deformation tolerances were also studied by Ghilea et al comparing tolerances of a penumbral aperture relatively to a pinhole aperture [16]. They proposed a design tool for the evaluation of aperture tolerances.…”
Section: Alignment Tolerancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5][6][7] However, many factors such as the isoplanatic property of the encoding aperture, edge sharpness of PSF and the optimization on the design of wide dynamic range, as well as measuring the precise PSF have limited the development of penumbral encoded imaging technology. [7][8][9][10][11] Penumbral encoded imaging technology started in 1980s, when Nugent reported on a series x-ray and neutron penumbral imaging simulation of fusion plasmas. 1,8 Subsequently, Ress et al 2 reported on the first experimental observation of fusion neutron penumbral encoded imaging with a spatial resolution 80 m. In the 1990s, Ress 12 attempted a penumbral encoded aperture space-invariant design, where some assumptions and approximations were made to ensure the isoplanatic property of the system point spread function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%