2009 IEEE Conference on Emerging Technologies &Amp; Factory Automation 2009
DOI: 10.1109/etfa.2009.5347149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aperiodic traffic in response time analyses with adjustable safety level

Abstract: In distributed real-time systems it is crucial to ensure the temporal validity of the data exchanged among the nodes. Classically, the frame Worst Case Response Time (WCRT) analyses, and the software tools which implement them, do not take into account the aperiodic traffic. One of the main reasons for this is that the aperiodic traffic is generally very difficult to characterize (i.e., the arrival patterns of the aperiodic frames). The consequence of this is that one tends to underestimate the WCRT, which may… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The integration of this scheduling in the modeling of flows should distribute temporally the transmission of packets and very likely reduce the waiting time of packets in output buffers. Moreover, the sporadic characteristic of avionics flows could be taken into account with the help of a probabilistic modeling, as it has been proposed for the a periodic traffic in the automotive context [Khan et al (2009)]. This leads to a probabilistic analysis of the worst case delay of flows.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The integration of this scheduling in the modeling of flows should distribute temporally the transmission of packets and very likely reduce the waiting time of packets in output buffers. Moreover, the sporadic characteristic of avionics flows could be taken into account with the help of a probabilistic modeling, as it has been proposed for the a periodic traffic in the automotive context [Khan et al (2009)]. This leads to a probabilistic analysis of the worst case delay of flows.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bounds on the worst case response times have been provided [2] and [3], researchers then started to integrate the limitations of hardware [4] and the communication stack, as the first analyses usually overlooked them, and also considered the effect of aperiodic traffic on CAN frame response times [5] and the consequences of transient perturbations [6]. Of course, methods to minimize the response times, or make them more predictable, were investigated too, e.g.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, finding the arrival function may be easy as usually the work-arrivals follow the Poisson distribution function for which there is a closed form expression. However, we can also model some other CDFs with the numerical-approximation for count models of the CDF or based on simulations, see [18]; again this is not the goal of the current work. Component Interfaces To model interfaces of WSN components we make use of an approach similar to the real-time calculus [17] and to the assume/guarantee interfaces [19] tailored towards guarantees on the bandwidth-availability, and requests.…”
Section: Node Component Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%