2007
DOI: 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.19.1.57
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Apathy in Dementia: An Examination of the Psychometric Properties of the Apathy Evaluation Scale

Abstract: The psychometric properties of the clinician, informant, and self-rated versions of the Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES-C/I/S) were examined using data on 121 outpatients seen in a behavioral neurology clinic for the assessment of dementia and associated neuropsychiatric disorders. Two factors, apathy and interest, were identified for the AES-C and the AES-I. The AES-S had only an apathy factor. The AES-C was found to have fairly good psychometric properties. However, from a diagnostic point of view, the AES-I pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
78
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Depressed subjects were divided into apathetic (AES ≥ 36.5) and non-apathetic (AES < 36.5) groups (Clarke et al, 2007). There were no significant differences in demographics, severity of depression, overall cognitive impairment, memory, and response inhibition between apathetic and non-apathetic depressed subjects at baseline (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Depressed subjects were divided into apathetic (AES ≥ 36.5) and non-apathetic (AES < 36.5) groups (Clarke et al, 2007). There were no significant differences in demographics, severity of depression, overall cognitive impairment, memory, and response inhibition between apathetic and non-apathetic depressed subjects at baseline (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depressive symptoms were assessed using the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) (Montgomery and Asberg, 1979). Apathy was quantified using the self-rated Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES), a psychometrically validated instrument in older normal individuals and psychiatric patients (Clarke et al, 2007, Marin et al, 1991). Overall cognitive impairment was examined in a clinical interview and was rated with the MMSE (Folstein et al, 1975) and the Dementia Rating Scale (DRS) (Mattis, 1988).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cutoffs of >36.5 for the self-rated and >41.5 for the carer-rated versions were used [21]. Furthermore, the AES is composed of a 4 factor substructure, Cognitive, Behavioral, Emotional and Other factors [19], where subfactorial scores can be calculated.…”
Section: Procedures and Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these factors are not consistently reported in other research, e.g. [21], and the AES has only been validated as a one-dimensional measure of apathy [15]. The Scale for Assessment for Negative Symptoms [22] is also less commonly used measure of different types of negative symptoms, affective blunting, avolition/apathy and social/emotional withdrawal, which have overlap with some apathy subtypes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apathy was quantified using the self-rated Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES), a psychometrically validated instrument in older normal individuals (Marin et al 1991;Clarke et al 2007). The 18 items on the scale assess behavioral apathy symptoms (e.g., He/she spends time doing things that interest her/him), emotional apathy symptoms (e.g., When something good happens, he/she gets excited), and cognitive apathy symptoms (e.g., S/he is interested in things).…”
Section: Apathymentioning
confidence: 99%