2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-1433.2004.03000.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aorto‐enteric fistula following endoluminal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…8 Only two other AEFs have been reported without any antecedent complications after EVAR (Table). 9,10 The aortoduodenal fistula in our case was not associated with an endoleak, graft migration, or increase in aortic sac size during 5-year surveillance postoperatively. Even after careful retrospective review of the five surveillance studies, there was no evidence of endoleak or graft abnormalities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…8 Only two other AEFs have been reported without any antecedent complications after EVAR (Table). 9,10 The aortoduodenal fistula in our case was not associated with an endoleak, graft migration, or increase in aortic sac size during 5-year surveillance postoperatively. Even after careful retrospective review of the five surveillance studies, there was no evidence of endoleak or graft abnormalities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] Clinical suspicion remains the sine qua non of making this diagnosis due to its relative rarity and lack of a definitive diagnostic modality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…86,109,128 Graft migration has been shown to occur with infrarenal fixation and is thought to relate to aneurysm neck length, aneurysm neck and device apposition zone length, and distal device support within the iliac system. 10,49,100,112,128 Fogarty et al 47 reported an incidence of 8% at 5 years, suggesting low deployment of the device below renal arteries as the most important predictor of subsequent migration. For each millimeter increase in the distance between renal arteries and the top of the stent-graft on postdeployment CT scans, the risk of migration increased by 6%.…”
Section: Type I and Migrationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…2,4,12,64,90,116 However, EVAR patients are not immune to the development of ADF and a small number of cases have been reported in the literature. 2,4,12,42,49,51,83,90,96,105,111,116 The exact cause for the development of ADF following EVAR remains unclear. A strong hypothesis is that local infection, which could be secondary to the grafting procedure or pre-existent (EVAR done for mycotic aneurysms) could result in intestinal necrosis and the formation of a fistula between the aneurysm and the intestinal wall.…”
Section: Aortoduodenal Fistulasmentioning
confidence: 99%