Aortic root dilatation in essential hypertension

Milan, Alberto; Avenatti, Eleonora; Tosello, F.; Iannaccone, Andrea; Leone, Dario; Magnino, Corrado; Veglio, Franco

doi:10.1097/hjh.0b013e32835f8fda

Cited by 24 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…24,25 Hypertension has also been shown to be related to dilatation of the ascending aorta without evidence of atherosclerosis. [26][27][28] Such ascending aortic aneurysmal changes increase aortic wall stress 29 and have been reported to increase the risk of AD drastically. 30 The vulnerability of the ascending aorta to having a dissection or contracting an aneurysm by exposure to hypertension has been suggested to be driven by genetic factors.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Blood Pressure, Hypertension, and the Risk of Aortic Dissection Incidence and Mortality: Results From the J-SCH Study, the UK Biobank Study, and a Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Hypertension or elevated blood pressure (BP) is an important risk factor for aortic dissection (AD); however, few prospective studies concerning this topic have been published. We investigated the association between hypertension/elevated BP and AD in two cohorts and conducted a meta-analysis of published prospective studies, including these two studies. Methods: We analyzed data from the Japan Specific Health Checkups (J-SHC) Study and UK Biobank, which prospectively followed 534,378 and 502,424 participants, respectively. Multivariable Cox regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for the association of hypertension/elevated BP with AD incidence in the UK Biobank and AD mortality in the J-SHC Study. In the meta-analysis, summary relative risks (RRs) were calculated using random effects models. A potential nonlinear dose-response relationship between BP and AD was tested using fractional polynomial models, and the best-fitting second-order fractional polynomial regression model was determined. Results: In the J-SHC Study and UK Biobank, there were 84 and 182 ADs during 4- and 9-year follow-up, and the adjusted HRs of AD were 3.57 (95% CI, 2.17-6.11) and 2.68 (95% CI: 1.78-4.04) in hypertensive individuals, 1.33 (95% CI: 1.05-1.68) and 1.27 (95% CI: 1.11-1.48) per 20-mmHg increase in systolic BP (SBP), and 1.67 (95% CI: 1.40-2.00) and 1.66 (95% CI: 1.46-1.89) per 10-mmHg increase in diastolic BP (DBP), respectively. In the meta-analysis, the summary RRs were 3.07 (95% CI 2.15-4.38, I2=76.7%, n=7 studies, 2,818 ADs, 4,563,501 participants) for hypertension and 1.39 (95% CI: 1.16-1.66, I2=47.7%, n=3) and 1.79 (95% CI: 1.51-2.12, I2=57.0%, n=3) per 20-mmHg increase in SBP and per 10-mmHg in DBP, respectively. The AD risk showed a strong, positive dose-response relationship with SBP and even more so with DBP. The risk of AD in the nonlinear dose-response analysis was significant at SBP >132 mmHg and DBP >75 mmHg. Conclusions: Hypertension and elevated SBP and DBP are associated with a high risk of AD. The risk of AD was positively dose-dependent, even within the normal BP range. These findings provide further evidence for the optimization of BP to prevent AD.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Blood Pressure, Hypertension, and the Risk of Aortic Dissection Incidence and Mortality: Results From the J-SCH Study, the UK Biobank Study, and a Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Sex-related differences in both AoR remodeling and aortic stiffness have been well described in the literature. [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46] Thus, men have a greater prevalence of aortic dilation, 39,43,[47][48][49][50] a greater magnitude of association of pulse pressure, age, and body mass index with AoR, 13 and a less steep rise in aortic stiffness with age compared to women. 40,[42][43][44][45][46] The exact biological basis of these sex-related differences remains unclear, however.…”

Section: Aor-cfpwv Group and Cvd Risk: Effect Modification By Sexmentioning

confidence: 99%

Aortic Root Diameter and Arterial Stiffness: Conjoint Relations to the Incidence of Cardiovascular Disease in the Framingham Heart Study

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Higher central pulse pressure is associated with higher carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (CFPWV) and an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). A smaller aortic root diameter (AoR) is associated with higher central pulse pressure. We hypothesized that the combination of a smaller AoR and higher CFPWV is associated with increased CVD risk (relative to a larger AoR and lower CFPWV). We tested this hypothesis in the community-based Framingham Study (N=1970, mean age 60 years, 57% women). We created sex-specific longitudinal echocardiographic AoR trajectories over 2 decades, categorizing participants into smaller versus larger AoR groups. We cross-classified participants based on their AoR trajectory and CFPWV (dichotomized at the sex-specific median). We used Cox regression to relate the cross-classified groups to CVD incidence on follow-up (median 17 years): lower CFPWV, larger AoR (referent group; 6.4/1000 person-years); lower CFPWV, smaller AoR (6.9/1000 person-years); higher CFPWV, larger AoR (23.1/1000 person-years); and higher CFPWV, smaller AoR (21.9/1000 person-years). In sex-pooled analyses, groups with higher CFPWV were associated with a multivariable-adjusted 1.8-fold risk of CVD ( P <0.01) regardless of AoR size. We observed effect modification by sex ( P for sex×AoR-CFPWV group interaction 0.04). In men, the group with smaller AoR and higher CFPWV was associated with a 2.5- to 2.8-fold risk of CVD ( P <0.001). In women, the group with larger AoR and higher CFPWV experienced a statistically nonsignificant 70% to 80% higher CVD risk. Our observations indicate that the prognostic significance of a smaller versus larger AoR varies in men versus women. Additional studies are warranted to confirm our findings.

show abstract

The Relationship Between Aortic Root Size and Hypertension: An Unsolved Conundrum

Mulè

Nardi

Morreale

et al. 2016

Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Thoracic aortic aneurysms rupture and dissection are among the most devastating vascular diseases, being characterized by elevated mortality, despite improvements in diagnostic imaging and surgical techniques.An increased aortic root diameter (ARD) represents the main risk factor for thoracic aortic dissection and rupture and for aortic valve regurgitation.Even though arterial hypertension is commonly regarded as a predisposing condition for the development of thoracic aorta aneurysms, the role of blood pressure (BP) as determinant of aortic root enlargement is still controversial. The use of different methods for indexation of ARD may have in part contributed to the heterogeneous findings obtained in the investigations exploring the relationships between ARD and BP. Indeed, the best methods for ARD indexation, as well as the normal values of aortic root size, are still a matter of debate.Several non-hemodynamic factors influence ARD, including age, gender, and anthropometric variables, such as height, weight and their derivatives body surface area (BSA) and body mass index. Of these factors, anthropometric variables have the greatest impact.Several studies documented an association between ARD enlargement, assessed by echocardiography, and some indices of hypertensive target organ damage such as left ventricular hypertrophy, diastolic dysfunction, and carotid intima-media thickening. Recently, we found that ARD, expressed either as absolute values or normalized for BSA (ARD/BSA) or height (ARD/H), was significantly greater in hypertensive subjects with chronic kidney disease (CKD) when compared to their counterparts with normal renal function. Moreover, at univariate analyses estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) showed significant inverse correlations with ARD not indexed and with ARD/BSA and ARD/H. Taking into account the effect of age, sex, duration of hypertension and other potentially confounding factors, in multiple regression analyses, only the association of GFR with ARD/H and that between GFR and ARD/BSA remained statistically significant. The receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that an estimated GFR of about 50 ml/min/1.73 m represents the better threshold to distinguish hypertensive patients with dilated aortic root from those with a normal one.Some population-based studies showed that an enlarged ARD might predict an adverse prognosis, even in absence of aneurysmatic alterations.In the Cardiovascular Health Study, a dilated aortic root was independently associated with an increased risk for stroke, cardiovascular and total mortality in both sexes and with incident congestive heart failure only in men. The relationship between ARD and heart failure has been observed also in the Framingham Heart Study. More recently, the PAMELA (Pressioni Arteriose Monitorate E Loro Associazioni) study demonstrated an independent relationship of ARD/H with incident cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.Although the relationship between BP and aortic root size is still a matter of debate, in...

show abstract

Aortic root dilatation in essential hypertension

Cited by 24 publications

References 24 publications

Blood Pressure, Hypertension, and the Risk of Aortic Dissection Incidence and Mortality: Results From the J-SCH Study, the UK Biobank Study, and a Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies

Blood Pressure, Hypertension, and the Risk of Aortic Dissection Incidence and Mortality: Results From the J-SCH Study, the UK Biobank Study, and a Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies

Aortic Root Diameter and Arterial Stiffness: Conjoint Relations to the Incidence of Cardiovascular Disease in the Framingham Heart Study

The Relationship Between Aortic Root Size and Hypertension: An Unsolved Conundrum

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About