2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.06.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aortic local biomechanical properties in ascending aortic aneurysms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To implement that, the local outer perimeter of each quadrant is required. Similar behavior can be observed between in-vivo strain and the ex-vivo parameters of Young's modulus [9] (Table 4). If we compare the quadrants in pairs, medial and anterior have the minimum values, while lateral and posterior have the maximum ones.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…To implement that, the local outer perimeter of each quadrant is required. Similar behavior can be observed between in-vivo strain and the ex-vivo parameters of Young's modulus [9] (Table 4). If we compare the quadrants in pairs, medial and anterior have the minimum values, while lateral and posterior have the maximum ones.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Some studies [ 7 , 8 ] emerge that in many cases of acute aortic dissection, the diameter is less than 55 mm. Lin et al [ 9 ] declared that there is a need for new, more effective criteria for the prevention of aneurysm complications based on biaxial tensile tests on the human ascending aorta. For instance, we can consider parameters like aortic compliance and Young’s modulus [ 10 ] that quantify the biomechanical properties of the aorta.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, in the LAT quadrant of both AsAA-BAV and AsAA-QAV samples, the LON direction had significantly greater failure stiffness than the CIR direction. In a previous study [ 5 ] on 100 patients, the value of failure stiffness in the LAT quadrant was the highest among all regions, while the value of the MED quadrant was the lowest. Therefore, the stress–strain and Young’s modulus–stress curves of MED and LAT quadrants were chosen for comparison ( Figure 2 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%