2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2017.12.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aortic Arch Reconstructive Surgery With Conventional Techniques vs Frozen Elephant Trunk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
77
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
4
77
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In a recent survey, reporting the currents trends in cannulation and neuroprotection during aortic arch surgery in Europe, bilateral, and unilateral ACPs were the most commonly utilized methods, accounting for 53% and 38% of strategies in the acute setting, and for 65% and 33% in chronic aortic conditions, respectively 8 . Although these operative strategies are directed at reducing operative mortality and morbidity, the occurrence of temporary and permanent neurologic deficits remains high 1–4 . Even in elective proximal arch surgeries, a 6% rate of paraplegia is encountered, highlighting the need for further measures to reduce this devastating complication, especially in the case of more time demanding extensive aortic repairs 21 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In a recent survey, reporting the currents trends in cannulation and neuroprotection during aortic arch surgery in Europe, bilateral, and unilateral ACPs were the most commonly utilized methods, accounting for 53% and 38% of strategies in the acute setting, and for 65% and 33% in chronic aortic conditions, respectively 8 . Although these operative strategies are directed at reducing operative mortality and morbidity, the occurrence of temporary and permanent neurologic deficits remains high 1–4 . Even in elective proximal arch surgeries, a 6% rate of paraplegia is encountered, highlighting the need for further measures to reduce this devastating complication, especially in the case of more time demanding extensive aortic repairs 21 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FET allows for single‐stage therapy in case of multilevel aortic diseases, favors the expansion of true lumen in type A acute dissections, and also offers a potential landing zone for subsequent transfemoral endovascular aortic repairs 1,3 . However, in this context, the optimal cerebral protection strategy remains controversial, and FET procedure‐related complications are not remote 1–4 . Neurological and spinal cord complications occur in 2.5% to 21% of treated patients 2,4 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations