2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.10.080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aortic arch aneurysm repair with a new branched device

Abstract: Aortic arch pathologies remain a technical challenge. The major difficulties in endovascular repair involve anatomic factors and technical aspects. The location of the disease may restrict an adequate proximal sealing zone, and alignment of the endograft is fundamental to acute success and long-term stability. We describe the successful endovascular repair of a 61-mm aortic arch aneurysm using a new branched device.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several branched arch repair techniques are in development, using devices that were custom-made with single or multiple side branches to accommodate the great vessels of the arch. 3,11 Currently, these devices are limited by their strict requirements of a healthy proximal landing zone, and initial reports of stroke have been a major concern. Although it is very possible that endovascular repair of arch aneurysms will become the main treatment modality for the elderly in the future, undue delay in providing treatment will invariably lead to further degenerative changes in the proximal and distal aorta, tortuosity, and thrombus formation, all factors detrimental to favorable surgical outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several branched arch repair techniques are in development, using devices that were custom-made with single or multiple side branches to accommodate the great vessels of the arch. 3,11 Currently, these devices are limited by their strict requirements of a healthy proximal landing zone, and initial reports of stroke have been a major concern. Although it is very possible that endovascular repair of arch aneurysms will become the main treatment modality for the elderly in the future, undue delay in providing treatment will invariably lead to further degenerative changes in the proximal and distal aorta, tortuosity, and thrombus formation, all factors detrimental to favorable surgical outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have reported favorable results using fenestrated/branched techniques in aortic arch pathologies. [3][4][5][6][7] However, this approach is limited by the morphological diversity of the aortic arch, necessitating patient-specific and tailor-made devices. Moreover, the procedures are complex and time-consuming, often inapplicable in emergency situations, and place a considerable financial burden on the patient, limiting their clinical usefulness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, relatively recently there have been increasing reports on the development and use of branched endografts for aortic arch pathology involving arch vessels with promising early results. 2,4,12 This technique offers a potential alternative treatment option for patients with aortic pathology involving the aortic arch especially in those who are not fit for open surgery. However, further research and long-term outcome data are required.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%