AOAC SMPR® 2017.001:Standard Method Performance Requirements (SMPRs) for Quantitation of Cannabinoids in Cannabis Concentrates

Audino, Susan; Angerhofer, Mark; Atkins, Patricia; Brauninger, Roger M; Brown, Paula N.; Burdette, Carolyn Q.; Clifford, Robert; Cook, Jo Marie; Donelson, J. R.; George, Kevin; Gibson, Peter; Harris, Heather L; Hartlein, Thomas; Hodgin, George; Inerowicz, Dorota; Johnson, Howard L.; Joseph, George; Konings, Erik J M; Kowalski, Julie; Krogull, Mary Kay; Kuzdzal, Scott; Lockerman, Robert; Ludwig, Cynthia; Marrongelli, Christina; Maštovská, Kateřina; Mudge, Elizabeth; Niehaus, G. D.; Nishimura, Masayuki; Phillips, Melissa M.; Phinney, Curtis S; Reif, K.; Rigdon, Amanda; Rimmer, Catherine A.; Ruthenburg, Travis C.; Solyom, Aniko M; Stenerson, Katherine; Sudberg, Sidney; Sutton, Alan; Szpylka, John; Weitzel, Jane; Winkler, P.; Wong, S N; Wurzer, Joshua; You, Hong; Coates, Scott G

doi:10.5740/jaoacint.smpr2017_001

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In terms of phytoconstituents, multiple studies describing diverse analytical methods for the determination of cannabinoids and terpenes in cannabis matrices have been recently reported [ 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 ]. Furthermore, SMPRs for the quantitation of cannabinoids in cannabis concentrates have been published [ 38 ], and several literature reviews outlining the most up‐to‐date information in terpene and potency analysis are also available [ 7 , 8 , 39 , 40 ]. Generally, potency testing is conducted by performing a solvent extraction, followed by a dilution/centrifugation step, and LC‐ultraviolet detection (UV) analysis.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of the California list of pesticides, mycotoxins, and cannabinoids in chocolate using liquid chromatography and low‐pressure gas chromatography‐based platforms

Reyes‐Garcés

Myers

2021

J of Separation Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cannabis legalization has led to the development of a variety of cannabis-infused products with edibles being one of the most popular. The state of California has implemented comprehensive cannabis testing regulations requiring the analysis of cannabinoids (potency) and contaminants, such as pesticides and mycotoxins, in any type of cannabis good. In this work, we propose an analytical workflow for the quantification of the California list of pesticides and mycotoxins, as well as six cannabinoids, in chocolate, using 3 mL of solvent for the extraction. For the analysis of pesticides and mycotoxins, clean-up steps employing a C18 solidphase extraction cartridge and dispersive solid-phase extraction sorbents were implemented. Gas chromatography amenable pesticides were analyzed using low-pressure gas chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry which allowed for a total method run of 12 min. Both liquid chromatography and gas chromatography instrumental methods had the same analysis time, ensuring satisfactory sample throughput. For the determination of cannabinoids, a dilution of the original organic extract collected for pesticides and mycotoxins analysis (and prior to any clean-up step) was used. Excellent results in terms of analytical figures of merit were obtained for all target analytes.

show abstract