2013
DOI: 10.15309/13psd140308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anxiety in Portuguese Pre-School Children – Adaptation of the Spence Pre-School Anxiety Scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(11 reference statements)
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of this study provide support for the reliability and convergent validity of the PAS in the Spanish preschool population. Internal consistency ( α = 0.84) was good and similar to previous studies carried out with preschool‐aged children in other countries such as The Netherlands ( α = 0.86; Broeren & Muris, ), Romania ( α was 0.87 and 0.89 for the mother and father reports, respectively; Benga et al, ), China ( α = 0.87; Wang & Zhao, ), and Portugal ( α = 0.88, Almeida & Viana, ). Reliability coefficients for each subscale were acceptable with alphas ranging between 0.63 and 0.73, except for the PIF subscale ( α = 0.50).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results of this study provide support for the reliability and convergent validity of the PAS in the Spanish preschool population. Internal consistency ( α = 0.84) was good and similar to previous studies carried out with preschool‐aged children in other countries such as The Netherlands ( α = 0.86; Broeren & Muris, ), Romania ( α was 0.87 and 0.89 for the mother and father reports, respectively; Benga et al, ), China ( α = 0.87; Wang & Zhao, ), and Portugal ( α = 0.88, Almeida & Viana, ). Reliability coefficients for each subscale were acceptable with alphas ranging between 0.63 and 0.73, except for the PIF subscale ( α = 0.50).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Reliability coefficients for each subscale were acceptable with alphas ranging between 0.63 and 0.73, except for the PIF subscale ( α = 0.50). Attending to the available data of the PAS, the PIF subscale's consistency was found to be moderate to good among studies (e.g., Almeida & Viana, ; Broeren & Muris, ). Although the reason for the low internal consistency found in this study for the PIF subscale is unclear, it may be explained by the low number of items in this subscale ( n = 3) included in the Spanish version.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Preschool Anxiety Scale (PAS) was used to evaluate six dimensions of anxiety symptoms (Separation Anxiety Subscale; Social Anxiety Subscale; Obsessive Compulsive Subscale; Physical Injury Fears; Generalized Anxiety; Total anxiety) from 28 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale, with 0 being "never" to 4 being "always". The instrument had previously been adapted and validated for Brazilian Portuguese 16 and had been shown to have high internal consistency (α = 0.88). A T-score of 60 as indicative of sub-clinical or elevated levels of anxiety.…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Testing the measurement properties of the higher-order model of the PAS could help us understand if the PAS is a reliable and valid tool for assessing both specific anxiety symptom subtypes and general anxiety in young children and, thus, can be applied as an assessment tool in both transdiagnostic and diagnosis-specific anxiety treatments for young children. However, unlike the measurement properties (e.g., reliability, construct validity, convergent validity) of the five-factor model of the PAS, which have been examined and supported in many countries (e.g., Almeida & Viana, 2013; Orgilés et al, 2016; Wang & Zhao, 2015), the higher-order model of the PAS has rarely been tested in samples outside Australia.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%