“…Initial disagreement regarding eligibility of 12 studies was resolved through discussion. Specifically, nine studies were included (Gillberg, Helles, Billstedt, & Gillberg, 2015;Gotham, Bishop, Brunwasser, & Lord, 2014;Gotham, Unruh, & Lord, 2014;Hagberg, Billstedt, Nyden, & Gillberg, 2015;Hagberg, Nyden, Cederlund, & Gillberg, 2013;Hare, Wood, Wastell, & Skirrow, 2014; Maddox Running Head: PSYCHOSOCIAL OUTCOMES OF ADULTS WITH ASD were not deemed eligible (Bejerot, Eriksson, & Mortberg, 2014;Gray et al, 2014;Hare, Gracey, & Wood, 2015). Two articles (Gotham, Bishop, et al, 2014;Gotham, Unruh, et al, 2014) employed the same sample, but analysed a different set of variables.…”