1968
DOI: 10.1037/h0025682
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anxiety (drive) and verbal learning: Implications for research and some methodological considerations.

Abstract: The methodological adequacy of the work considered as experimental tests of the Taylor-Spence drive theory is examined. Pertinent research involving verbal learning (serial, paired-associate, and transfer) paradigms is reviewed in the context of recent methodological and theoretical developments in verbal learning. Sources of potential confounding are highlighted in addition to suggested refinements in methodology which permit more adequate tests of the Taylor-Spence theory.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1972
1972
1984
1984

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Schizophrenic §s perseverated more with overlearning than without, and this difference was significantly greater than the tendency for normal §s to make more intrusion errors without overlearning. Thus, overlearning made the inhibition of (Goulet, 1968;Underwood, Runquist, and Schulz, 1959) and by the interference with specific associations characteristic of paradigm A-Br (Postman and Stark, 1969). General evidence f7om the present study concerning the nature of A-Br interference was cited earlier.…”
supporting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Schizophrenic §s perseverated more with overlearning than without, and this difference was significantly greater than the tendency for normal §s to make more intrusion errors without overlearning. Thus, overlearning made the inhibition of (Goulet, 1968;Underwood, Runquist, and Schulz, 1959) and by the interference with specific associations characteristic of paradigm A-Br (Postman and Stark, 1969). General evidence f7om the present study concerning the nature of A-Br interference was cited earlier.…”
supporting
confidence: 51%
“…Analysis of paired-associates learning into two functional stages (Underwood, Runquist, and Schulz, 1959;Underwood and Schulz, 1960) (Goulet, 1968).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because interset intrusion tendencies are weaker here than in Spence's competitional list, it is less plausible that complex response energization could affect simple learning. Also, Goulet (1968) explains that simple learning can be impaired by drive only if complex responses are below threshold. Yet inspection of the present data reveals that subjects had learned over 90% of complex responses during training.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The drive interpretation of anxiety has successfully predicted human behavior in classical conditioning (Spence, 1964) and serial and paired-associate verbal learning (Goulet, 1968). At the same time, the Taylor-Spence theory has led to negative results as well (Maltzman, Eisman, & Morrisett, 1961;Pyke & Agnew, 1963), bringing into question either the usefulness of the theory or the adequacy of the tests of the theory.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%