2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2007.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anxiety and error monitoring: Increased error sensitivity or altered expectations?

Abstract: This study tested the prediction that the error-related negativity (ERN), a physiological measure of error monitoring, would be enhanced in anxious individuals, particularly in conditions with threatening cues. Participants made gender judgments about faces whose expressions were either happy, angry, or neutral. Replicating prior studies, midline scalp negativities were greater following errors than following correct responses. In addition, state anxiety interacted with facial expression to predict ERN amplitu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

5
28
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
5
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This model predicts that with similar task demands, highanxious participants recruit more cognitive resources (i.e., they are less efficient) than do low-anxious participants to reach the same level of performance. Our behavioral results are consistent with this theory, since trait anxiety did not influence performance (see also Compton et al, 2007;Hajcak et al, 2003). To compensate for this reduced efficiency, the use of more cognitive (or emotional) resources in the high-anxious group could translate as a different recruitment of cognitive control areas in anxiety (for converging evidence, see Braver et al, 2007;Fales et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…This model predicts that with similar task demands, highanxious participants recruit more cognitive resources (i.e., they are less efficient) than do low-anxious participants to reach the same level of performance. Our behavioral results are consistent with this theory, since trait anxiety did not influence performance (see also Compton et al, 2007;Hajcak et al, 2003). To compensate for this reduced efficiency, the use of more cognitive (or emotional) resources in the high-anxious group could translate as a different recruitment of cognitive control areas in anxiety (for converging evidence, see Braver et al, 2007;Fales et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…It is possible that the adolescents in the high anxiety group were more anxious compared to the adolescents included in the low-average group. Anxiety levels or even induced fear have been shown to influence ERP components (Dennis and Chen, 2009;Compton et al, 2007;Moser et al, 2005;Vocat et al, 2008). However, a general or task-induced effect of anxiety might not explain the task specific effects found in the current study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…Such individuals, as a consequence, would be likely to show impaired expectancies around negative events and compensate by maintaining higher levels of vigilance/arousal for bad outcomes, which would be clinically observed in the form of higher anxiety [87], [88]. The observation of significantly higher levels of trait anxiety in the abnormal VTA/SN MDD subgroups supports such a hypothesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%