2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00113-018-0541-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anwendung motorisierter Verlängerungsmarknägel am wachsenden Skelett

Abstract: Different approaches for intramedullary lengthening nails can be used in children and adolescents to correct leg length discrepancy with or without concomitant deformities. The treatment is limited by the size of the available nails, the residual growth and extent of the deformity. Larger trials will be needed to further validate the application of lengthening nails in skeletally immature patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unrelated to these adverse events, the MHRA also raised concerns about a potentially "inappropriate use in children and adolescents" (British Orthopaedic Association 2021). The MHRA acknowledges a widespread use of PRECICE devices in this age group, but highlights that the nails have not been validated for use in these patient groups (Frommer et al 2018, Nasto et al 2020, Iobst 2020, Iliadis et al 2021, Vogt et al 2021. In our study, 10/27 patients were younger than 18 years old with the youngest patient being 11 years of age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unrelated to these adverse events, the MHRA also raised concerns about a potentially "inappropriate use in children and adolescents" (British Orthopaedic Association 2021). The MHRA acknowledges a widespread use of PRECICE devices in this age group, but highlights that the nails have not been validated for use in these patient groups (Frommer et al 2018, Nasto et al 2020, Iobst 2020, Iliadis et al 2021, Vogt et al 2021. In our study, 10/27 patients were younger than 18 years old with the youngest patient being 11 years of age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 1 4 The optimal choice of the surgical implant, i.e., intramedullary nail with blocking screws, plate, or external fixator depends on the status of the growth plate, location and severity of the deformity including the need for multiplanar corrections, concomitant limb length discrepancy (LLD), and not least the preference of the surgeon. 5 8 …”
Section: B Ackgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To prevent physeal damage in immature patients antegrade ILN implantation is considered to be contraindicated and consequently lengthening is usually carried out using external fixators (Wagner et al 2017, Frommer et al 2018. In patients with preexisting ankle and hindfoot fusion and concomitant closure of the distal tibial growth plate, the retrograde approach allows the use of a tibial ILN and eliminates the need for external fixators.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In patients with preexisting ankle and hindfoot fusion and concomitant closure of the distal tibial growth plate, the retrograde approach allows the use of a tibial ILN and eliminates the need for external fixators. The distraction goal should be defined on the basis of the predicted LLD at skeletal maturity when conducting leg lengthening in immature patients with a closed distal tibial physis (Frommer et al 2018). In patients with fused ankle and hindfoot the goal of the treatment should not be exact LLD equalization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation