2019
DOI: 10.5539/ijb.v12n1p30
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ants’ Mental Positioning of Amounts on a Number Line

Abstract: Myrmica sabuleti ants have a mental number line on which numbers (non-symbolic displayed amounts) are ranked, the smaller on the left and the larger on the right. Here we try to know if the difference between two successive numbers is identically estimated all along this line or is less and less well estimated with increasing number magnitude. Ants were trained to distinguish two successive numbers differing by one unit (1 vs 2, 2 vs 3, …, 6 vs 7) during 72 hours and tested after 7, 24, 31, 48, 55 and 72 h. Th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a study on the ants' correct location of the zero (Cammaerts & Cammaerts, 2019d), after two training days, these insects presented a conditioning score of 83.3% (meanly 4.0 vs 0.8 ants) when asked to learn 2 vs 1 elements, and a score of 82.6% (meanly 3.8 vs 0.8 ants) when asked to learn 1 vs 2 elements. In a study on the ants' representation of numbers on their number line (Cammaerts & Cammaerts, 2020), a mean conditioning score of 83.4% was observed for the ants' discrimination of 1 vs 2 elements, for a training period up to 48 hours. All these proportions are in agreement with one another, their average being 81.9%.…”
Section: Effect Of Shape Color Size and Relative Position Of Elemenmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a study on the ants' correct location of the zero (Cammaerts & Cammaerts, 2019d), after two training days, these insects presented a conditioning score of 83.3% (meanly 4.0 vs 0.8 ants) when asked to learn 2 vs 1 elements, and a score of 82.6% (meanly 3.8 vs 0.8 ants) when asked to learn 1 vs 2 elements. In a study on the ants' representation of numbers on their number line (Cammaerts & Cammaerts, 2020), a mean conditioning score of 83.4% was observed for the ants' discrimination of 1 vs 2 elements, for a training period up to 48 hours. All these proportions are in agreement with one another, their average being 81.9%.…”
Section: Effect Of Shape Color Size and Relative Position Of Elemenmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This can be accounted for a size effect, i.e. the fact that discrimination becomes harder when numbers or physical stimuli increase in magnitude (Cammaerts & Cammaerts, 2020).…”
Section: Effect Of Shape Color Size and Relative Position Of Elemenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relation between the ants' discrimination and this relative difference was best described by a logarithmic function. This is detailed in Cammaerts and Cammaerts (2020b).…”
Section: Numbers Arrangement On the Number Line (Table 3 Figure 3)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This decrease appeared to vary with the relative difference between two successive numbers according to a logarithmic function. Details in Cammaerts & Cammaerts (2020b). ISSN 2157-6076 2020 Figure 1.…”
Section: Numbers Arrangement On the Number Line (Table 3 Figure 3)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Honeybees use the counting of up to 4 landmarks for navigating (Dacke & Srinivasan, 2008), can be learned to differentiate under appetitive conditioning 2 and 4 elements from 3 (Gross, Pahl, Si, Zhu, Tautz, & Zhang, 2009;Bortot et al, 2019), can spontaneously discriminate between 1 and a quantity distant by >3 numerosities , and can be learned by appetitive-aversive conditioning to discriminate between 4 and up to 8 elements (Howard, Avarguès-Weber, Garcia, Greentree, & Dyer, 2019d). Ants can discriminate 1 -4 elements (Cammaerts, 2008) and even up to 7 successive elements differing by one unit, but with a decreasing discriminating accuracy as the number of elements increases (Cammaerts R. & Cammaerts, M.-C., 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%