Antriebe

Baumgarten, Henning; Böhmer, Marius; Hinz, Michael; Nijs, Martin; Pischinger, Stefan; Souren, Mike; Thewes, Matthias; Lindemann, Bernd; Flecke, Thomas; König, A.; Schaub, Joschka; Schönen, Markus; Lückmann, Dominik; Bönnen, Dennis; Jean, Emmanuel; Huber, Markus Q.; Kunze, Klaas; Andert, Jakob; Krings, Andreas; Scheer, R.; Etzold, Konstantin; Klawitter, Marc; Stapelbroek, Michael; Kaiser, Jörg; Hosseininasab, Mehdi; Sauer, Alexander; Doncker, Rick W. De; Henn, Jochen; Antony, Peter; Schildhauer, Christoph; Haag, Andreas; Mohrdieck, Christian; Sontheimer, Uwe; Gumpoltsberger, Gerhard; Greiner, Jürgen; Bartha, Alexander; Frey, Peter; Plank, Robert; Krautkrämer, Berthold; Malik, Reinhart; Solfrank, Peter; Pecnik, Hermann; Lanzer, Heribert; Eichner, Georg; Kurz, Gerhard; Lehrheuer, Bastian; Heuser, Benedikt; Eichlseder, Helmut

doi:10.1007/978-3-658-25557-2_6

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 112 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The first machine element is an involute tooth in the three main directions. This tooth geometry is used in vehicle gearboxes [60] and thus has a high degree of practical relevance. In the design, attention is paid to the largest possible undercut at the tooth root so that a failure of the tooth root also occurs in the test and can be examined.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Design of a Cost-Effective and Statistically Validated Test Specification with Selected Machine Elements to Evaluate the Influence of the Manufacturing Process with a Focus on Additive Manufacturing

Grüger,

Sydow,

Woll

et al. 2023

Metals

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Due to their versatile advantages, the use of additively manufactured components is growing. In addition, new additive manufacturing processes are constantly being developed, so that a wide range of printing processes are now available for metal. Despite the same starting material, the microstructure and thus also the final mechanical properties differ greatly compared to conventional processes. In most cases, only direction-dependent characteristic values from the uniaxial tension are used to qualify a printing process before it is used. The literature, on the other hand, demonstrates that the results are not transferable to other loading conditions. In this work, several engineering tests were integrated into a single test specimen so that they can be determined on the same specimen. The test specimen can be used to test tooth root strength, bending strength, notched bar impact energy, and thread strength depending on the mounting direction, thus representing industrial loading cases. In this study, test specimens were fabricated by conventional manufacturing (machining), L-PBF (Laser Powder Bed Fusion), and WA-DED (Wire Arc Direct Energy Deposition), and the results were compared using statistical methods. Factors to capture manufacturing influence and buildup direction were statistically validated on 316L. The work shows a benchmark with a typical initial microstructure of rolled and milled material, L-PBF, and WA-DED parts on loads close to the application and thus simplifies an industry-oriented evaluation of a new manufacturing process.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%