2016
DOI: 10.1075/hl.43.1-2.09ray
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anton Marty & Karl Bühler: Between mind and language – Zwischen Denken und Sprache – Entre pensée et langage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Appearing in the era of the confrontation between idealism in the form of phenomenology and materialism in the form of behaviorism, Bühller's (1934) communication model rejects language as a communicative code from the addressee and addresser, depriving it of psychology and metaphysics, which were indicators of the unscientific for phenomenologists and behaviorists, and puts the language code in no less metaphysical place, outside the participants of communication. As a result, Bühller (1934) obtained a three-part communication model in which 1) the addressee, 2) the addresser and 3) the code (together with objects and situations) act as equal factors in communication presented as an unrecognized and therefore elusive process between the three (as cited in Raynaud, 2016). Jakobson (1960) picked up this idea.…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Appearing in the era of the confrontation between idealism in the form of phenomenology and materialism in the form of behaviorism, Bühller's (1934) communication model rejects language as a communicative code from the addressee and addresser, depriving it of psychology and metaphysics, which were indicators of the unscientific for phenomenologists and behaviorists, and puts the language code in no less metaphysical place, outside the participants of communication. As a result, Bühller (1934) obtained a three-part communication model in which 1) the addressee, 2) the addresser and 3) the code (together with objects and situations) act as equal factors in communication presented as an unrecognized and therefore elusive process between the three (as cited in Raynaud, 2016). Jakobson (1960) picked up this idea.…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%