2014
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu438.51
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antitumor Activity of Pembrolizumab (Pembro; Mk-3475) and Correlation with Programmed Death Ligand 1 (Pd-L1) Expression in a Pooled Analysis of Patients (Pts) with Advanced Non–Small Cell Lung Carcinoma (Nsclc)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
54
0
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
54
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Smoking history was associated with an increased ORR to pembrolizumab (48), and this was consistent with an RR of 25% for smokers versus 16% for never smokers seen with MPDL-3270A (47). A similar pattern was observed for active/former smokers treated with nivolumab and MPDL-3280A (41,49); the underlying mechanism remains unknown; however, it is possible that smoking status is a surrogate marker for mutational density (50).…”
Section: Ctla-4 Inhibitorssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Smoking history was associated with an increased ORR to pembrolizumab (48), and this was consistent with an RR of 25% for smokers versus 16% for never smokers seen with MPDL-3270A (47). A similar pattern was observed for active/former smokers treated with nivolumab and MPDL-3280A (41,49); the underlying mechanism remains unknown; however, it is possible that smoking status is a surrogate marker for mutational density (50).…”
Section: Ctla-4 Inhibitorssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…20, [33][34][35] Nevertheless, the absence or low expression of PD-L1 does not preclude response to or survival benefit from nivolumab. 19,20,23,36 In this study, equivalent responses were noted across tumor PD-L1 expression levels with no discernible association between PD-L1 expression and PFS or OS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, different companies and academic centers are using different antibodies, and we have little data to help choose the best diagnostic antibody or threshold. Moreover, although initial data obtained in solid tumors suggested that PD-L1 expression on tumor cells was the strongest determinant of response to PD-1 blockade, there is a meaningful response rate even in apparently PD-L1-negative tumors 15,42,43 ; in fact, at least in some cases, the tumor microenvironment may determine response more strongly than PD-L1 tumor expression. 15 It must be remembered that PD-L1 expression on tumor cells is a dynamic process, induced by interferon signaling and other factors.…”
Section: Blockage In Hematologic Malignancies 3395mentioning
confidence: 99%